Just started getting this now. Hopefully it’s some A/B testing that they’ll stop doing, but I’m not holding my breath

5 points

Who uses the internet without JavaScript? Must have so many broken websites

permalink
report
reply
0 points

True

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I installed NoScript just a few days ago, because I’m forced to use a really weak computer that struggles to even browse the modern web. I feel like NoScript improved it a lot, and while quite a few websites broke (including lemmy) (but most will still display the content), I just set the ones that I need working to trusted, but the performance is still good (I should note I’m also using it in conjunction with an automatic tab discarter).

I however also don’t directly use Google. Both SearX and Yandex don’t need javascript, so I’m unaffected by these news, despite being a bit mad about it as a reflection of the direction the web is going as a whole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Same I started blocking js some sites that need it I will turn it on

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Try Ublock origin instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m using both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I run NoScript, which blocks all JavaScript. I manually allow websites as I need it. It blocks all kinds of annoying nonsense while I browse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I started disabling JavaScript by default with uBlock Origin a few months ago. I am surprised to report that a bunch of sites work fine without JavaScript.

There are definitely some sites that actually need it, and for those, it’s just one click to permanently allow for that site. But most of the sites I need work better with just CSS and HTML because there are no stupid nags or social media sign-in buttons that pop-up anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Switch to Kagi

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I get a notification every month telling me that they will charge me for my monthly Kagi subscription and every single month i feel the same:

‘Totally worth it!’

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I feel like their pricing would make more sense if you could just pay for your usage, rather than forcing a subscription

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

They do have different tiers depending on your search volume and features, so in a way they already have this. I’d hate to have to go through checkout every time i did a search.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Doesn’t it require JavaScript?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Who still uses Google? DDG has been way better for a long while now. Join the duck side.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Kagi is also good. Better imo really

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Love how you’re getting downvoted for suggesting a great search engine which doesn’t require JavaScript. Stay classy, everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Probably because they didn’t mention that it’s not free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It really isn’t

Giving up your payment information is not great for privacy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
2 points

Got about half way through this, yikes. I thought their pricing was already a bit steep per search, but considering the company decisions, it does not fill you with confidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Brave search 🤙

Edit: I forgot that Lemmy hates Brave and doesn’t want anyone to use it. Be warned, there are some concerns people have about the organisation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It isn’t half bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The vast majority of humanity still uses Google. DDG is basically unheard of outside of tech enthusiast circles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree, but if you want js off while web browsing, you’re already in that advanced tech circle and are a part of that demographic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

…and who also has JS off? That seems like a weird combination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Its gaining ground very quickly

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

searxng? Anyone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hell yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Uses Bing results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Configurable, though, to use many other engines and results.

Lots of overlap, but there are a couple other indexes out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

So that’s why it’s so good at finding porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn’t a big deal to most people.

Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

I don’t blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

Google is a text input and a list of links. It should work without JS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s far more than that. Even on a basic search page. Ever expanded the ‘Peaplo also ask’ section, for example? It loads more results based on your scroll position or interaction.
There’s loads of little things like this, you may just not notice or care about it - which is another discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

This is an optional feature. The core search functionality does not require JS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

All of the people replying to this saying you shouldn’t need JS are totally unaware how modern web development works.

Yes, you could do many sites without JS, but the entire workforce for web development is trained with JS frameworks. To do otherwise would slow development time down significantly, not allow for certain functionality to exist (functionality you would 100% be unhappy was missing).

Its not a question of possibility, its a question of feasibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I wish JS would die and we get nice and simple websites back. I hate web dev so god damn much. The internet is pure enshittification

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t know how to tell you this, but removing JS doesn’t turn the internet into a wonderland. Capitalism is to blame for enshitification not JS

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

My question is if it wasn’t required before and is required now, what changed? It’s not like Google has added a killer feature recently - this is almost certainly related to those shitty AI answers that are forcing your actual search results even further down the page than they were already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even things like lazy loading and such require js though

A lot of features might not be obvious honestly

If you’re interested though, you could check the source which should be able to tell you immediately what they use it for

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It wasn’t required, but id wager 99% of website that exist currently run JS in some form or another for something.

Id wager its impossible to have anything dynamic on a webpage without JS (minus visual dynamics which can be handled with css), at that point you have to replace it with a different programming language and every browser needs to completely change gears to allow other code to run instead. But what advantage is gained by changing to another programming language? Cleaner code w/ less jankyness? Sure I guess, but we would be moving mountains to accomplish a silly thing.

I’m wondering if many people in this thread understand what JS is and does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m a React dev. You can create server side websites, written in JS, that don’t require JS to be turned on in the browser. Granted, this just became a new official feature in React but has already been available with React frameworks like NextJS

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

For full functionality sure. For basic functionality no. Searching on Google is basic functionality I’d say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not really. Showing ads and gobbling up data is Google Search’s core functionality, and JS is indispensible for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Idk if you were around when Google popped up, but it was at a time where the internet was feeling increasingly “loaded” with thousands of info per page. One where the popular engines tried to serve you twenty different things along with your search. Here’s an example:

https://www.definitions-seo.com/images/altavista-3.jpg

Or another:

https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/uploaded/timeline/yahoo/yahoo-2003.png

This isn’t a search engine. This is an all you can eat buffet, where the smallest plate is two main courses and three sides. And users just wanted a candy bar.

So you see, a lot of us started to use Google because it was simple. It was decluttered. It was a text input with a ‘submit’ button, and that’s all we wanted. THAT is, and was, google’s core functionality, and I think it’d do them well to remember that.

Now, if you wanna argue that’s changed, I can agree to that. But I don’t want morning news when I search for porn, that’s just gonna kill my boner. And I don’t want ads about coffee makers when I’ve just bought a coffee maker, that just means you’re incompetent. I want a search engine that searches things and provides results. That’s it. And just like Google caught momentum because they delivered this minimalistic facade that the users wanted, this is also how Google will die - at the hands of the next lightweight engine without corporate bullshit. Because the users will gobble it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree that it’s not a big deal, but there still should be an option in my opinion. It can be a lifesaver to be able to search on older devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You should still be able to use something like Lynx to browse and search. There’s no reason to block basic functionality except that you can and don’t care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

As a former web dev, good. I didn’t get paid enough to care about the people that block JavaScript

permalink
report
reply
3 points

as a web dev graceful degregation should be the first thing you learn

permalink
report
parent
reply

Mildly Infuriating

!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

Create post

Home to all things “Mildly Infuriating” Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I’m not about stealing content!

It’s just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should match the theme of this community.

-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.

-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 543

    Posts

  • 9.7K

    Comments