6 points

tangent but something I don’t really understand is why openai doesn’t sell ads against their chats with non-paying users. I can’t recall even seeing it brought up as an option. why is that?

permalink
report
reply
20 points
*

This landed on HN like a dead fish: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41722985

Another submission with what looks like a lot more positive spin got more reaction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41726603

Edit choice comment from the latter

If you assume that the costs of inference would continue to decrease while they would be able to get billion people hooked on 42 per dollar plan…

That’s $0.5 trillion revenue rate

A billion people. Paying the equivalent of a premium streaming service. For something that can’t even generate pr0n.

Color me skeptical.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Hat tip also to the guy who tried to spin “oil is a commodity” as though there’s the same demand and economies of scale for chatbots as for liquid dinosaurs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What does well on HN is pretty random imho

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

dang does hate Ed’s site in particular, up to faking titles

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

OpenAI Is A Bad Business?

Would have done so much better

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

SoftBank’s Vision Fund will be investing $500 million in OpenAI

The herald of destruction: SoftBank! OpenAI is doomed!

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Dont forget king sawbones

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

consider it a tax on the Saudi sovereign wealth fund

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Let’s call it the Adam Something Stupid Dictator wealth tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It’s incredibly frustrating to try and figure out how this grift works. The company is bleeeing money at high pressure. The more users they get, the faster they lose money. Even if you’re a true believer who thinks their product is useful and will be ubiquitous in the near future, there’s no way this makes sense as an investment.

It could be a greater fool scam, but if you’re goddamn Softbank, Microsoft, or NVIDIA investing hundreds of millions, surely you are the biggest fool already? Who’s MSFT gonna flip their share to? Scrooge McDuck? A G7 member government? God?

Or maybe they’re expecting to become so ubiquitous you can’t live without ChatGPT, at which point they will jack up the price (the good old MS EEE/Oracle Hustle). I suppose that would parse, but the novelty is already fading and public sentiment is at a downward slope. Even if you’re a true believer, you’d have to beat the competition first. You could also hope for a magician to come along and suddenly invent chips that are an order of magnitude more efficient, but you’d still need to pay another king’s ransom to have them designed, manufactured and sold to you (and absolutely not to your competitors).

How do they get away with these bonkers numbers? They’re somehow going to make 20 times more revenue in the remaining year than they have until now? They’re going to nearly double their earnings every year? They’re gonna fucking invest seven trillion in TSMC chip fabs? These numbers are made up by a nine-year old. My burger restaurant where we use natural diamonds as grill charcoal is gonna be worth inifite plus one zillion brazillion skibidillion dollars next year. Please invest in it.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Investors demand growth. The problem is that Microsoft has basically won Capitalism and has no real area to grow to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah. Microsoft is actually kind of the victim here, since they’re investing both financially and materially in LLM hardware (and giving Altman and friends a massive discount on Azure resources) when the demand is really not materializing. Facebook went all-in in the metaverse and was eventually chastened for it as much as an organization that size ever can be. Microsoft is doing the same with OpenAI, though with far more capital expended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

as the dynamics stand they’re more enabler than victim, in the terminology of harm. and I’d argue that applies, because this shit is harmful

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Look, we just need to get enough money to launch von neumann probes to the moon, disassemble it and build a shell of computronium around the earth, and then AI will be able to do my job. Trust me bro, just one moon (it won’t even get mad)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This post is endorsed by Unicron

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

psst I see dead corpos

(I’ve made a Kendrick joke before, and fuck it I’m gonna make it again)

permalink
report
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 349

    Posts

  • 9.5K

    Comments

Community moderators