Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

9 points

Ian Moss on Twitter

YouGov just asked me “if there were a general election tomorrow which way would you vote” and I felt sad that the question machine had been working towards this moment all its life and then didn’t have the sentience to know it had finally made it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Took me a moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

(I’m still in the moment, please explain?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The automated hypothetical question re-iterated for years now was at last true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

https://matduggan.com/a-eulogy-for-devops/

Possibly interesting blog post about what the idea of “devops” promised, and how it failed to deliver. With any luck, the “getting back to basics” thing will actually happen, instead of people imagining they are google and building nightmares out of kubernetes.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’m so sick of “if only we had more humanities in education the elites wouldn’t be fucking up the world.” that has nothing to do with reality, it never has, it never will

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Is law considered part of the humanities because lawyers have been fucking things up in society since at least the French revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

if only king leopold had been exposed to the humanities bro 😞

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

traveling back in time and teaching the rulers of the british empire about a little thing called literature

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

i thought it was a part of prevention of future engineer disease cases

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

it ought to be named philosopher’s disease

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah same, but hey my cs education had courses both on basic ethics and how to run businesses, so some attempts were made at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It really is unwarranted self importance. t humanities major

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Personally haven’t seen a headline about Ol’ Billy Boy ever since word got around that he was a diamond medallion member of the lolita express airlines. William Gatorade thinks AI’s got what climate craves, i.e. waste heat.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Gates also mentioned that AI will be a good force in providing better health care and tackling climate change, in particular by calling nuclear fusion energy a clean alternative to fossil fuels.

Ah yes, fusion. With the wealth of data we have from - checks notes - stars and bombs, the applied statistics machines will surely be able to extrapolate working fusion reactors.

Don’t know what we need Gates for. Surely an AI should be able to spout this bullshit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Don’t know what we need Gates for. Surely an AI should be able to spout this bullshit?

Ugh, so many people are working the “AI will solve X problem” mill. I don’t need nor want AI to be there increasing output.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

i think that openai also wanted to solve their problems with fusion, but they got a step further, they made a startup for this. not normal nuclear power plant hot rock machine, no, they want tech that is perpetually Just A Decade Away. it makes some perverse sense if your funding is dependent on misguided hype only

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Eh, there’s a chance that machine learning might help here… there’s some interesting stuff come out of that area of research, like radio antennae and rocket engines and so on, but I’d bet anything that a) no LLMs were involved and none ever will be, and b) “ai” only appears in marketing copy and funding pitches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

dunno about rockets, but antenna thingy works only because you can simulate performance of antenna very reliably, precisely and quickly. This data was fed back, random small changes were made, things that were an improvement passed to the next iteration. Not sure how this approach is called but none of it is LLM

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

fusion research is just thinnest disguise for thermonuclear weapons research, especially the inertial confinement fusion variety

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Why is he carrying books and DVDs on a baking sheet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

One is by David Brooks, so it’s guaranteed to be half baked?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He has a smart oven with AI and wants to feed it data?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

FEED ME, SEYMOUR BILLY!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

we finally posted Diz’s LLM logic puzzle post to Pivot to AI! Let’s see if this draws flocks of excited new users to awful.systems … we’re doing Ray Kurzweil tomorrow, lol.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

There was a warcraft 3 pro who played build orders created by Chat-GPT and it was fascinating the degree to which it was able to perfectly imitate the form of the kind of thing you’d find on liquidpedia or some other guide but simultaneously make nonsensical errors that betrayed that it had no awareness. Like, telling you to build a unit of a different race or build without meeting prerequisites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

lol, amazing. and I recall this was one of the areas where people fairly successfully (iirc?) applied GAs to synthesising strategy and build order

(think it was for Starcraft 2 not WC3, but domains very similar)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve definitely seen some impressive machine learning-based outcomes (definitely fucking up the technical details here) but there’s a world of difference between a system trained to play StarCraft and a system trained to predict the next bit of text.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 430

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators