The guy who used Midjourney to create an award-winning piece of AI art demands copyright protections.

Excuse me while I go grab my popcorn.

-2 points

I make props, armour, movie replicas as a hobby. I do it all by hand.

I get a bit of an eyeball twitch when someone shows me a prop and goes “I made this too” “of yeah, what did you use as a base material?” “Oh it’s 3d printed” “oh so your printer made it…”

permalink
report
reply
7 points

id consider them making it if they were also the one who designed the 3d object without taking someone elses work. if they just downloaded a model, made minor changes than print it, I would not consider it their work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, I spend hours digitally sculpting parts sometimes, and then once it’s printed I spend hours filling and sanding the build lines and painting. Having also built parts by hand, they’re equally skilled work in different ways. Digital sculpting is just a lot less messy which means it’s much easier for me to do at home, lol. Do not miss the days of hand-sculpting foam and making silicone molds and fiberglass parts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

One of the reasons I like AI art is that it’s pretty settled law that something produced by purely “mechanical” means can’t itself have copyright, since copyright requires both originality and a human author.

It seems like a reasonably compromise, the AI was created by hoovering up the commons, so anything it creates should belong to the commons. I expect a lot of lobbying in the future to try and change it though.

permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

And if AI work would be copyrighted by the “prompt artist” then all the artists whose work is in the training set can sue the prompter for profiting of their work without licensing fees. It would be a legal clusterfuck so it was pretty wise to side step the whole issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

First off, stop calling him an AI artist.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

You can make art using AI. I’ve seen artists use it to clean up line art, color, shade, fill in backgrounds, and more. AI is just a tool. Lots of people only use text prompts, which I agree is hardly controlling, but that is only a single way to interact with AI. You can do a lot with these models.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

All this is true, but none of it is relevant to a guy who’s demanding copyright protections and royalties for something Midjourney spat out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree, but I wasn’t sure if this comment was generally anti-AI or understanding of the nuance. For the record, AI scares me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But…

The AI is the artist!

Not sure what this other guy is doing though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Calling someone a prompt “engineer” should be punishable by law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It’s literally what they are !

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fun Fact: PE is actually a legally protected title (the P in a real engineer’s title stands for professional)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

meanwhile startups: prompt coder/wizard!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

please call them rockstars i want to see them suffer the way real programmers did

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The term is apparently prompt-fondler now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can generate Mandelbrot pictures that no one else has ever seen. That doesn’t make me an artist.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

This is like piracy, just because you claim you loose money, doesn’t mean any sane being would pay you even if it was necessary, most would rather just not.

permalink
report
reply

Furry Technologists

!tech@pawb.social

Create post

Science, Technology, and pawbs

Community stats

  • 641

    Monthly active users

  • 86

    Posts

  • 243

    Comments