This case is quite similar with Disney+ case.

You press ‘Agree’, you lost the right to sue the company.

2 points

This should be illegal, all these companies want to make money with 0 risk to them. Get em out of NJ!

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Uber looked at Disney and thought “hmm yummy, get us some of those sweet backlashes”.

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*

Anarchists used to blow up corporate buildings for this shit when government failed to keep these sociopaths in line’

Corporations these days need more fear of behaving like this: Courts need to stop allowing this shit. Legislators need to ban these practices. Prosecutors need to sue these companies to force courts to rule on this bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

Cyberpunk 2077 was on to something about Corpos. This is just evil.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Not Cyberpunk 2077, but cyberpunk - the genre of science fiction.

CDPR didn’t invent it - it’s been a thing for many decades.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberpunk

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

Well, I won’t be using Uber any more. Right alongside anything produced by Disney.

Fuck both of them.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

Woman died because an employee at a Disney resort served her food with peanuts in it. Her widower tried to sue, because the woman had confirmed with the server that there would be no nuts, and the server assured them there wouldn’t be. So someone on the restaurant’s side fucked up. Pretty open and shut case of negligence.

Disney’s lawyers tried to get the lawsuit dismissed, by saying that the husband had agreed to binding arbitration in the Terms of Service when he signed up for a free two week Disney+ trial on his Xbox several years prior. He never actually paid for a subscription, and cancelled after the free trial. But Disney was saying that the binding arbitration clause was still in effect in perpetuity, even after the trial ended and he cancelled the service.

Disney quickly reversed course (and “allowed” the man to sue them) once they realized it was making headlines, because they didn’t want to deal with the bad PR. But if it hadn’t made headlines, Disney’s lawyers likely would have continued pushing for dismissal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He was also merely acting as an agent for her estate, not suing them personally, and she hadn’t agreed to any arbitration

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The amount of brain worm from this whole thing is amazing to me. This is on the level of trumper shit at this point. Seeing so many people incapable of acknowledging that they misunderstood something is just crazy. Anyway, just wanted to let you know you’re a good person for being patient with so many boobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
  1. Moving to arbitration where the party making the agreement picks the arbiter, is close to being dismissed because there is about a 10% chance of winning.

  2. The restaurant is in Disney Springs. Correct that its not Disney but they still have a stake in the restaurant.

Your misinformation is just as bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Disney has no ownership stake in the restaurant,

Then they should have argued that instead of “you can’t sue us for negligence because of a completely unrelated service you used for a week several years ago.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So disney has no control or agency over any of its restraunts or third party vendors it overseas, controls, places guidelines on, issues quality control specifitions, and can remove at any moment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Did Disney do something recently?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

FYI, the disney situation that people are referring to here is a very complicated legal situation rife with bad actors. The reporting on it was broadly mishandled by the media, so legal professionals have broken it down. It is far more nuanced than people here are making it out to be and the simple narrative that you will see getting upvoted entirely mischaracterizes what actually happened (ie happened according to both disney and the plaintiff, yes they both agree). But due to the fact that disney kind of comes out of the situation looking like - dare I say - the good guy (or at least the gooder one), people have latched onto the misinformed simplistic narrative because it requires less effort and falls into the evil corporation trope. So instead of making any claims here, because I’m exhausted from arguing with Internet babies and I have a ketamine therapy today, I encourage you to watch Legal Eagle’s breakdown of the case.

I’m not trying to convince you of anything other than the fact that this is a complex topic that has been mishandled by the media. I work in an extremely remote location with thousands of people that might as well be flat-earthers, so being truthful is extremely important to me. And we will need honest discourse if we as a society are ever going to overcome the misinformation brainworm that US politics has put on steroids. Good luck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They tried the exact same thing not too long ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh yeah, I forgot about injustice in the sea of injustice that has been the last few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Create post

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 5.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 561

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators