Thereās more to life than girls, so whoās the real simp here? š¤
If the girls hear you say this, youāre going to get permabanned from the dating platform.
To be fair, when youāre touch-starved and attracted to women sometimes it really feels like theyāre the most important thing in life lol.
Straight men can, and should, touch each other more often (CONSENSUALLY. I canāt stress that enough). Hugging, holding hands, playing with one anotherās hair, giving a gentle backrub etc. between straight men should absolutely be more normalised. Weāve been conditioned that any physical affection between men is a sign of sexual attraction, when history (and many extant cultures) show us that men can physically love one another without any sexual attraction whatsoever. The only reason weāre touch starved is weāre too afraid to be vulnerable with other men.
Not all touch needs are met platonically. Might as well advise touch-starved single men to hug their mothers more.
I hug my wife all the the time. Just makes it hurt all the worse that she doesnāt hug back, let alone our other issues. Hug my kids too. Its not their job, or anyoneās, to satisfy every needy bastard out there, and yet: thereās supposedly mutual attraction for that.
Does he think women donāt have similar struggles getting men as well? Or that straight women simps exists?
They struggle with finding a good/the right man to keep long term, but simply getting a date takes half an hour on tinder while they can choose between 50+ guys in their immediate neighbourhood.
And this isnāt even purely my imagination, itās annecdotal from things my sister pulled off.
Getting a date might be easy.
Is getting a date with someone who wants to do more than have sex with them a time or two?
The problem with Tinder is that most women will use it to date wildly out of their league. If youāre in the top 10% of guys (good looks, money, etc.) you can choose between 10 women to go on a date with every single night, so of course thereās no reason for them to ever commit. Meanwhile, all of those women who are dating them are hoping they can get them to commit if they have sex, which of course doesnāt work, because why settle for one dish if you can have a buffet every day?
But after having had a taste of the top shelf, itās difficult to go back to average, so now these womenās standards are totally overinflated. They think because theyāve slept with a top dog, it must be possible to marry him too, and so they wonāt settle for someone in their own league, kinda like once youāve had a steak at a $100 per plate restaurant, itās difficult to go back to Outback or Sizzler.
So many of them end up wasting their best years chasing the alphas, and by the time they realize itās not gonna happen, theyāre in their mid-30s, have gained 50 pounds from all the post-breakup ice cream they ate, and all the guys who would have married them in their 20s have either settled for someone else, or developed a massive depression, mental illness, alcoholism, or killed themselves.
Anonās got problems, and somehow thatās everyone elseās fault. Classic 4chan
Anyway meanwhile in normal human land, the presence of pornography does not decrease the dating pool.
Iām not siding with the crazy person posting the green text, just explaining their point. They are saying that the simps made it so profitable to be a virtual girlfriend that all women have become one, and there are no girls left that will date him because theyāve learned they can profit off of sex. When you really read it, op is an incel and believes the only thing keeping women from prostitution is the guaranteed paycheck. Op believes that once they realize the money will come in, every girl in the world will become a professional sex worker.
It has decreased my dating pool by exactly 1. My ex started doing porn and I decided I couldnāt go back.
Best thing to ever happen to me. No drunk texts and no forgetting why we split up.
No hate on people who date others in porn. Itās just not for me.
I think my point really is that the number of people who are available to date hasnāt really gone down because the industry exists. Now you may not want to date someone in the industry, and thatās totally fine, but anon doesnāt even have anyone yet and is complaining about a purely theoretical problem as if itās a real one.
No, they have bigger issues.
I know. However, you said something that made my train of thought pull into a particular station. So you got a useless story because thatās what I do.
And I agree with everything you said.
But the unstable relationships and alcohol abuse worked for ya. Got it. Good for her.
Exactly right; sex work has always existed (relative to the existence of currency/bartering tribute and some semblance of homo sapien societies) and will always exist in some form. There have always been those who are willing to be in relationships with sex workers and those that wonāt. The landscape has changed, but the worldās oldest profession remains.
Anon imagines half the global population can be the 1%.
Need to expand your dating pool anon.
Hope my math checks out. If not Iām sure someone else will correct it:
I was just curious: With a projection of 9.000.000.000 people living in 2035: If 99% of the woman died as you said this would be 45.000.000 living woman. This would result in a population of 4.500.000.000 people in total. So we need to find a reason why half of the total population died š
Can we talk about why homeboy didnāt just pay for silver? Seems worth it IMO.
