5 points

We have no choice.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

But to experiment with a system we still don’t understand all that well?

Oh yea, that’s a great idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We’re already experimenting and making a mess of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re right, but let’s not forget we’ve already “geoengineered” numerous times. Various dam projects, islands creation, connecting waterways that didn’t previously connect… And we made plenty of mistakes then. I have even less faith in this. We will probably hyper focus on what humans need vs what the planet needs and target some metric that only after we achieve it, realize it’s terribly wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It seems my feed agrees with you, with this poetic juxtaposition.

(And I agree with you, too.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is a ridiculous assumption. We have a preponderance of choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The system is too slow to adapt. It simply can’t be changed fast enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Didn’t any of the climate scientists see Highlander 2: The Quickening?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’m sorry that you also had to watch that pile of crap lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 739

    Posts

  • 3.4K

    Comments