1 point

A diamond gets its value from human suffering. The more pain and suffering to obtain it the more value is placed on it.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Thats what scientists dont get. No child blood = no value to rich people

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Diamonds actually get their value because a single entity (DeBeers) owns something like 80% of all diamonds in the market.

They dictate the price by throttling supply and naming a price. People are willing to pay as a flex but you are right in that DeBeers markets “real” diamonds and “lab grown”.

It’s mostly done to capture different market segments, and to keep up the value of their stockpile of nearly unlimited diamonds already mined by people who are essentially slaves.

That being said, if there was a market for diamonds soaking in vials of oppressed orphan blood (with provenance of course) DeBeers would absolutely sell it.

If lab grown diamonds became significantly cheaper than slave mined diamonds, DeBeers would still likely keep their mines open to maintain control of the market. Even if they successfully moved consumers on to lab diamonds - can’t have someone else get diamond market share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d like one lab diamond pocket knife pls.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I can’t wait for the glorious future - one day this won’t be unrealistic anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I want diamond optics for my camera, unless that is stupid for the physics of optics.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Pretty sure the lines of cleavage would make it pretty difficult to get a useful lense shape made out of the stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Diamond doesn’t have the best absorption spectrum compared to high quality optical glass. You’d end up losing more light.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i tought they could already make artificial diamonds relatively easily?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Not that easily I think.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 87

    Monthly active users

  • 88

    Posts

  • 103

    Comments

Community moderators