cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22423685

EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io. Please don’t abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

-4 points
*

People can always just stop using YouTube. It’s getting laughable the level of Stockholm syndrome-like addiction people have for that shit service.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

The problem is, there’s just no (good) direct competition. The audience will follow creators once enough of them switch to the same alternative platform. But as long as there’s no platform with a comparable amount of money behind it, most people will continue to use Youtube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

There doesn’t need to be direct competition. Just stop watching YouTube. If someone cannot do that- they have an addiction, and ads are not their biggest problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because there’s absolutely no valuable information that exists on YouTube, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Youtube is my main source of entertainment. I don’t watch regular TV, and I barely watch any movies or series. Doesn’t have anything to do with an addiction, it’s personal preference lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Eh, there are some competitors:

  • Nebula - costs $5/month; can get a discount if you find a creator’s discount code (I used NotJustBikes, can check out LegalEagle, HalfAsinteresting, or any of the others if you want; I got 50% off a year sub)
  • Odyssee - pretty much the OG alternative to YT - I follow a few there
  • Rumble - much better funded, but caters to conservatives and far-right, but there are some more moderate videos there (I like Glenn Greenwald, except for anything related to Russia); I think it’s funny that it has been blocked by some countries for allowing pro-Russian content, while also being blocked by Russia (this year) for not removing content

I sub to some channels from each (as well as Twitch and YT) though Grayjay, which seems to work pretty well. I’d say about 50% of my video watch time is on YouTube, 15-20% on Odyssee, 20-30% on Nebula, and a little on Rumble. I try to watch Nebula videos on the Nebula app so creators get credited with watch time, but I honestly prefer Grayjay.

I’ve been trying to cut down on how much I watch anyway, so hopefully I’ll be able to slowly eliminate YT from my life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Rumble - […] I think it’s funny that it has been blocked by some countries

Rumble is blocked here in Brazil, not because Brazil blocked it (although there was once a strife between Rumble and Brazilian Supreme Court due to a half dozen far-right influencers) , but because Rumble themselves blocked us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I know about Nebula, but you have to admit, the barrier to entrance is a lot higher for most people because of the subscription fee, so it’s not necessarily a direct comparison. Some of my favourite content creators are on there.

Didn’t know about Odysee. As far as I can see, that platform uses crypto for payments, which could also act as a deterrent to some people.

As for Rumble: Personally, I wouldn’t touch anything related to JD Vance with a ten foot pole (he’s a pretty big investor). And one of their biggest channels seems to be by Andrew Tate (ew). To be fair, I couldn’t tell you for sure that Youtube doesn’t take money from any of them in some form. But they seem to be more of an equal opportunity offender lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I pay for Nebula and, although there’s a lot to watch there, skimming through the boring stuff is horrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s good to see alternatives. I am not at the point where I need to see online videos badly enough that I’d pay for it- but it’s good to know that it exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Same. I mostly watch a handful of channels:

  • various TLDR channels
  • Morning Brew - not a fan of the hosts, so I’ll catch maybe one/week
  • LegalEagle - anything not about celebs
  • the Friday Checkout
  • NotJustBikes and other city infra-related channels - they don’t post often though
  • RealLifeLore
  • Wendover/HalfAsInteresting - the host annoys me a bit, but the content is usually pretty good

There’s a ton of nonsense there that I don’t like, but now that I found a set of channels I do like, I mostly just look in the “library” tab so I don’t have to see the other crap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Knowing better and Philosophy Tube are both rather good as well. I do miss Casual Criminalist from YouTube, otherwise Nebula has my bases covered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I also hate the UI tbh. I want the front page to be my subscriptions. Instead you get a weird horizontal scrolling panel on a secondary tab. I wish I could get an inbox, RSS style, so I could either watch them or skip/mark as watched.

Nebula also suffers from the homepage being cluttered with old videos that are no longer relevant. For example I don’t care to watch news and tech videos from 2022.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

As someone who does a lot of DIY what are my options? I can’t learn from reading and have nobody to show me how in person. Other platforms are so incredibly limited I can’t ever find any content helping me learn something. What other platform is seeking to ACTUALLY compete with YouTube by offering fair compensation and exposure to the masses? It’s so incredibly expensive to try that nobody is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Pay tor youtube or watch the ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Or, if you’re not a moron, you can Firefox, and ublock that shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Don’t know what to tell you. I’m Simply saying that I personally refuse to support any product that I would actively complain about online in social media posts. And if I’m willing to yell at people online about how shitty something is- yet continue to not only use it- but contribute to the financial success of said company-

I’d have to admit that I was a hypocrite.

Because “there is no other option for me to watch a video” isn’t a good reason to support a platform that treats its content creators like utter garbage, and alienates its user base seemingly daily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d you have android, I recommended newpipe or one of it’s fork like tubular. Or Seal or it’s fork Ytdlnis.

There are several front ends for yt-dlp on Mac and Windows as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I don’t really think Stockholm syndrome applies here. I don’t watch YouTube out of some irrational bond with the platform. I watch YouTube because it’s literally the only place the creators I watch upload. I would absolutely follow the creators I watch to whatever platform the content is available on. Until then, I’m stuck with YouTube and ad blocking extensions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

I’m not saying it’s exactly the same. But there are definitely people that whine all day and night about it, and then go pacify themselves by watching even more YouTube videos.

If I hate something as much as people seem to hate YouTube, I can easily stop using it. But then again, I have enough strength of conviction to do so. I’m certainly not going to financially support them by patronizing their service. And this futile attempt to circumvent their add service was is only making them more clever about blocking people from doing so.

YouTube will always win this.

Period. End of story.

The only way to beat them is to not play. I guarantee you if the lose 50% of their viewers. They’ll change their tune.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s a fair point. There’s a million things you could do, and watching videos on YT is just one of them. Watching videos online has become a large part of peoples lives. Surely it has a lot to offer, but we should probably not forget it also replaces a lot of things, things we would spent are time on otherwise, if we didn’t have YT as an easy time-drain, and those other things are presumably equally rewarding or more so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Youtube isn’t just a thing people use to waste time, but a source of educational content. That actually matters, and there isn’t a good alternative to much of it.

That being said, I agree that people could at least drop it (or reduce their usage) if they are just using it as a time waster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Youtube isn’t just a thing people use to waste time

I fully agree, didn’t mean to imply it’s just that. But it’s also that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

People should learn to live without YT, instead of making an existential drama about it (about its ads, really).

permalink
report
reply
-15 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

tell me you don’t work in IT without telling me you don’t work in IT.

YT is more than just thots in shorts and fake scumbag competition game show hosts.

there’s a whole community of educators and creators that are genuinely useful and is the core of what YT used to be used for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

25 years in IT and I didnt need youtube.

BUT, I prefer learning by reading, not videos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
193 points

i absolutely despise youtube. these fuckers are putting ads on paused videos now, and then this.

they will never get better. only worse. we need regulations badly.

permalink
report
reply
-27 points

You want regulations on ads for a free service?

The entitlement is wild.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You’ll never get upvotes for telling people this reality, but you are of course completely correct.

If only we saw as much enthusiasm for voting generally as we see for taking ads off YT. Maybe we’d actually get a government that was willing to regulate titans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Works for Albania.

Its not like google fucking earned that money anyways. You don’t earn billions of dollars.

Think about it. If you earned a million dollars a year, you’d be set for life. If you lived for a full hundred years you’d have only made 1/10th of a billion dollars. Despite the fact that its still more money than either of us will probably ever see.

The people who operate google have billions with an s at the end. Think about the hardest working person you’ve known. Think about how little money they made.

Now ask yourself, what did the people with billions do to earn that money? How hard did they have to work to justify it, and how is that level of work even humanly possible? How would a bunch of spoiled overgrown trustfund fratboys find it in themselves do that work?

They fucking don’t. The only people who get that rich do it by cheating, and stealing, and fucking people over. Those fuckers owe us a lot more than video streaming services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

👌👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Your math is off. You said one million per day, but your 1/10 of a billion would have it as one million per year

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They’re a monopoly that relies on users to produce content. You see, in a functional capitalist system, when one supplier deliberately hinders competition through unfair trade practices, they are made to change their methods in order to foster competition.

When that system is corrupted and fails to act in a timely manner, all bets are off.

You know where else you can go to find the billions of videos users have uploaded? No. How did it get that way? Just, luck? No.

Yes, we want regulations on ads in YouTube, and it’s an ignorant and arrogant position to call that “entitled”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Free or not, monopolies should be regulated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

Do you pay for nebula?

permalink
report
parent
reply
147 points

We need a competitor badly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Peertube/Odysee exist, even if they are relatively niche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Competitor with no content, users is not a competitor. Youtube should be forced to share content they do not own. Just for the sake of competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

rumble is pretty good

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I use odysee, and so far it’s been nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’d like to move to PeerTube, but I mostly just post stupid memes, and game clips on my YouTube. And as generic as that is I don’t really know what instance to go with. Most instances seem to either focus on tech, or education. And that’s good to have but I want a more general instance from a uploader pov.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Paying Nebula subscriber here 🙋‍♂️

Pony up or your call for a competitor doesn’t mean anything. People don’t want ads? Fine. There has to be another revenue stream. Server capacity costs money, making a website and app cost money, and video creators need to eat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Then isn’t the obvious move to just pay for youtube?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do pony up for other services (not YT Premium because I won’t give Google any money) and support a significant number of creators via Patreon, giving them more money by far than they’d ever see from me from ads. And I’ve spent thousands of hours on my own dime making written content and giving it away for nothing with no ads or tracking. So yes, I agree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Absolutely this. I pay for both my Proton and Notesnook accounts. No ads, no trafficing my data, and services I like and believe in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Whatever happened to dailymotion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

iirc they tried to become a tiktok clone, no idea how it went but considering i never see anyone talk about it i doubt it went very well

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Does anyone really post anything to Dailymotion besides blatantly unauthorized TV stuff? I can’t imagine it’d be very good vibes for anyone trying to make an honest living with original content over there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I used it a bit because its also on Grayjay but its pretty terrible and focuses a lot on big media than individual people

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Dailymotion does not allow for commenting anymore. That’s why I stopped using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Wow all this bullying is really convincing me to go back to their shitty platform.

If i can’t access my fav creators anymore itl just motivate me to do sm productive, like building web3

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I don’t judge people who give in to the oppressor. Life is hard and you have to pick your battles, more important stuff then blocking ads for “normal” people.

For me its largely a disability/accessibility thing. The whole site is not usable.

Its not that i want to die on this hill its that corporate bullshit is measurably detrimental to my health. My hill is the only one i can exist on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Haven’t you heard? web3 is going great so far!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Oh no, the execution and information thus far has been horrible. You are alluding to blockchain are you? When i look at the website you post i see absolutely nothing that i even recognize as web3 its all cryptostuff.

I don’t get why everybody is so hell-bend on blockchain based internet (sure its decentralized but come on, we’re creative enough to do better). Its like people don’t get the point of “user owned” and are expecting companies to build a better internet for them without serving their own interests.

No, we are going to need to do this ourselves, self host our own data and services, open source everything.

Lemmy and the fediverse are the closest i have seen to being proto web 3 in spirit and there are also still far from perfect.

I have read the “What is web3” from that site and could not disagree on the definition more. I would not be suprised if both the blockchain cults and this website are part of the propaganda machine that is stopping a free internet from happening.

My web3 is aligned much more with this: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/user-liberation-watch-and-share-our-new-video

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

Start asking your favourite content creators to post on PeerTube.

permalink
report
reply
-21 points
*

And while we’re at it, stop calling them ‘content creators’

EDIT: to clarify, my stance on this is that ‘content creator’ devalues the human endeavour behind a piece of work (or content, if you will). Instead it’s just slop for the machine, and who cares what it is as long as it gets numbers, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

What is the alternative name for someone who creates content for a platform?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, we start by referring ta work not as “content”, but as what it actually is. Then work from there. For instance, one could ostensibly call Ahoy a filmmaker or a documentary maker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do we need a general term? Someone who uploads their videos to a video platform is probably a “video producer”.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Content

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Why? What else would we call them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To answer the “why”, it’s because the word “content” is kinda meaningless. Instead of making films, documentaries, talk shows, reference guides, cartoons… it’s all just this generic “content” slop that’s just there to feed the machine

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Entertainers. Show women/men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Call them what they truely are. Digital panhandlers

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Male/female adult online entertainer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Right. Call them youtubers! Wait…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’ll take the name Content Creator over Influencer any day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

And how are they going to make a living to keep producing videos?

I’d say ask them to join Nebula.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Paying Nebula subscriber here 🙋‍♂️

I can’t stand hearing people whine about wanting everything for free and how DARE people try to make a living so they can eat in between making videos!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

That depends. If they only make a living with YT ads, then it’s going to be hard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I guess I forgot things like Patreon which could be a valid option. Although I’m neither a fan of subscribing to specific creators nor am I particularly fond of Patreon.

With Nebula my perception is that I pay a monthly fee and they can figure out who gets what depending on whose videos I watched. I don’t need to be particular in my action on who to support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

About half the ads I see on YouTube are already within the videos they post. I wonder what the overall ratio is of YouTube ad revenue versus in-video ad revenue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I just want the videos no creator makes money on. I expect thats about 50% at least. Let’s start there. Put them in the Library of Congress and YouTube will be free to enshittify themselves into oblivion without complaint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Nebula is cool and all, but at the end of the day, it’s still a commercial platform, and those do tend to enshittify and depend a lot on externalities.

As creators grow more dependent on Nebula, Sam and the team of original Nebula creators can wield more power and change the rules.

They already dictate the kind of content that is allowed - for example, Second Thought, one of the original creators behind Nebula, was asked to leave as he doesn’t agree to change public stance on Israeli-Palestinian conflict (he is pro-Palestine). This has suddenly left him without a source of revenue necessary for the production to expand, and has put him into debt.

Solution? Probably independent sponsorships that would go both on YouTube and PeerTube videos. Or a creator reward system like in Lbry/Odysee. Something that would allow to reward creators without going full commercial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They can still post on YouTube.

It might take a tiny bit of their revenue away but I doubt it would make much of a dent, especially for creators that run mostly on patreon anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Remember when people posted on YouTube for fun? It’s only when it became a viable business that the platform turned to shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah yes, youtube now is just one big ad and sponsorship cesspool flooded with clickbait and misinformation and with highly privacy invasive protocol. Its a souless capitalisic corporate machine. I dont know why people would still use it. Just let youtube die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Patreon and all the other services creators have at their disposal already.

Don’t think most Youtubers can make a living these days solely on YT as revenue, and are already exploring other avenues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So you want them to take a huge pay cut? To what benefit, just YoUTubE bAd?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Direct payment to creators seems like the most simple and efficient method.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

All the people I watch on youtube make the majority of their money on patreon or twitch. Youtube is way too heavy handed with demonitization and copyright strikes to be a trutsworthy income source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

or odysee ig but i cannot find a good peertube instance i can post in

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What are your criteria for a good instance? I host one myself, so genuinely curious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The age limit yeah I think the peertube instances on their site follow the gdpr

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

on which instance?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tilvids.com is a good start. Fx The Linux Experiment is there.

Otherwise, I host peertube.wtf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And then watch the peertube instance die. See also: https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/issues/5783

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Civvie 11 is a old head. How do I convince him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What have you tried so far?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 154K

    Comments