1 point

Cool. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*

A nuclear plant is not a bad thing, that’s one of the cleanest eneegy sources BUT being Microsoft I’m glad it’s at least on an island

permalink
report
reply
24 points

It’s on an island, yes. In a river, ten kilometres from a dense urban region.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And it’s the site that an American president came closest to dying in a nuclear explosion! (I mean that’s not why it’s notable, but it’s a fun fact anyways.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

lol uh… you know about the location and history of that facility… right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’s a nuclear power plant that provided clean and safe energy for many decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*

While that is true, it was also the site of the worst nuclear disaster on US soil.

Don’t get me wrong - I’m not scaremongering, and I support nuclear power. It’s just a bit darkly ironic, imo.

Edit: I gotta go down these Wikipedia rabbit holes you guys are pointing me towards, because I’m clearly somewhat misinformed here. Seriously, thanks for sharing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
*

There is nothing clean or safe about three mile island. The place had a meltdown and created tons of nuclear waste. Next you’ll be trying to tell me Fukushima and Chernobyl were safe, clean, and cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Three mile island is outdated tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Are there any nuclear power plants in the US that aren’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

A nuclear plant is not a bad thing

This specific one famously is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol I didn’t know that

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

I know certain sentiments are coming, so I’ll put this here: Three Mile Island wasn’t the unmitigated disaster that fearmongers would have you believe. It was an ultimately harmless accident that was highly publicized because of poor communication and irresponsible sensationalist journalism.

More on the topic: https://youtu.be/cL9PsCLJpAA

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Yep. And underscoring that more than almost anything else is the fact that the TMI facility continued to operate without incident for forty years after that accident.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

It was actually a success story. It failed safe, as designed.

Unfortunately “The China Syndrome” really pumped up anti-nuclesr sentiment.

TMI was the opposite of Chernobyl.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Heh, you see my posts? That movie came out not 2-weeks ahead of 3-Mile. Freaky isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“Nuclear” sounds scary but it doesn’t have to be and generally isn’t. There are currently 94 active nuclear reactors in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States

IMHO, the correct take on “<blank> uses enormous amounts of energy” is “yes, we do need to invest more in renewable and clean energy”. Anyone who didn’t have their head in the sand could have known that last century. This is only a problem now because our political leaders have failed us, year after year, decade after decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Small addendum, there’s 94 commercial reactors that are generating power for the grid

But there’s a few dozen more active nuclear reactors that exist for things like training and research.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_research_reactors#United_States

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you for the clarification!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And then there’s like 80 reactors moving around the world, docking in our ports.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

“Nuclear” sounds scary

Related, unfun fact: MRI used to be called NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, because it used the nuclear magnetic resonance phenomenon (literally a nuclear vibe check), but people were so afraid of the word “nuclear” that it was dropped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

😒🫸 MRI

😎👉 NVC

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Posted this earlier:

A poof of radioactive steam let loose. That’s it, the whole incident. People freaked out on March 28, 1979.

In totally unrelated news, The China Syndrome, a popular movie about a reactor meltdown, came out March 16, 1979.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I thought the Netflix show was pretty clear it wasn’t as bad as popular history made it out to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is just begging for a kernel memory space access joke…

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

This thing can’t continue.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Why?

It had a proper “fail-safe” incident. It functioned as intended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

They intended for it to partially melt down?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t twist their words. The plant, when faced with a meltdown incident, was able to shut down safely with no injuries or detrimental effects to anyone, as intended. The plant then operated safely without incident for another 4 decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes, it’s safe and all but using a whole nuclear power plant for AI is a waste of resources.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 577

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators