103 points
*

It’s really more like Remote Desktop+. It has some additional “features” (slight retch) on top of traditional Remote Desktop features.

Let’s wait and see if it’s actually more secure than traditional Remote Desktop.

(and I’d still rather use Wine)

permalink
report
reply
48 points

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

waypipe exists, but it’s still not perfect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It’s very cool, but not widely used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I doubt it’s nearly as secure as OpenSSH though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Bottles and boxes are basically the Windows app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

No, it’s just remote. Remote desktop is now also called Windows, also the operating system you are connecting to is called Windows.

Gnome has relatively good rdp support, so with this you could use Windows (the app) on Windows (the os) to connect to you Linux machine running Gnome.

It seems deliberately confusing naming is working as expected, Microsoft marketing team should get extra raise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Microsoft strategy 101. My “favourite” is the database called “SQL Server”

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I thought this was dumb as fuck, but I think I understand what Microsoft is trying to do here.

What might not be obvious is that this “Windows” app is for iOS, Android and Linux - yes, it’s a replacement for remote desktop but it’s specifically a remote desktop app to connect to Windows machines.

So while I still this this rebranding is entirely unnecessary, I can see that they are trying to clearly distinguish “I’m not on windows and I need to do something on windows so I’ll use the windows app for that” .

It also means less confusion when “remote desktop” doesn’t let you connect to your Mac or whatever.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

One year from now: web search “Windows App broken” and then starting cutting myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Something tells me the community forums will still refer to it as remote desktop or RDP anyway

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But the users looking for a fix may not

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

What the fuck is that title

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Not confusing at all, not even the slightest bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Some journalist memeing

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

wine

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Drunk

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Let me guess. It won’t support directx calls?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

It’s a remote desktop client, so it won’t. OP read only the title of the article

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 929

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments