110 points

Imagine killing three people over a $2 subway fare and parading around the city like you’re anything other than a domestic terror force

permalink
report
reply
62 points

PICK UP THAT CAN, CITIZEN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

okay okay don’t shoot anyone’s dick off

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

NYPD brass said the alleged fare-beater had charged at the officers with a knife and made verbal threats against their lives; he was last said to be in critical condition, along with one of the bystanders

Yeah, that may have been how it started.

Body-worn camera footage, which Maddrey said he reviewed before the press conference, allegedly showed the man make a verbal threat to the officers. He told the cops, “I’m going to kill you if you don’t stop following me,” the chief said.

Definitely sounds like the police at fault, and the guy wasn’t a walking time bomb or anything.

I get that the situation with the police in the US is cooked, but saying this was over a $2 fare isn’t really being honest about the situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

I mean, for discharging your firearm in an enclosed space with tons of people around? Yeah, I definitely would consider the police at fault. Should the guy with the knife have been persued once it was revealed he was armed? Sure, I can accept that. But what I do not accept is that the police seem to, despite the absurd modern toolkit at their disposal, only have two tools they actually use: their taser and their gun.

Why is it that seemingly anywhere else a knife-wielding assailant can be subdued without blood being drawn, but here it results in several people suffering life threatening injuries and one dead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

It’s much cheaper (and better for psychological conditioning to the Policed States of America) to just hire the cheapest community college dropouts with a pant size bigger than their IQ than it is to attract, train, and maintain a respectable (read: “for the community”) police force. If the US adopted similar requirements for their police as a country like Germany, I’d imagine we’d lose well over half of our force instantly, with most of the rest quitting soon after being asked to not shoot people at the first sign of noncompliance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think the argument being made here is that what you have described is egregious enough and also a fair take on what is alleged to have happened.

Unlike saying “a guy jumped a turnstile and police opened fire for $2” which now looks like a ragebait equivocation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

seemingly anywhere else a knife-wielding assailant can be subdued without blood being drawn,

Where has this actually happened though? I very much doubt it’s standard practice for any police force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Except there is no evidence of a knife outside of the police story, bystanders say there was no knife and to my knowledge they still haven’t found a knife

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“OH shit, Bobby shot some bystanders. We better say there was a reason we were shooting other than he was running away.”

“He had a knife! That’s the ticket!”

No knife found. Just typical police bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There’s body camera footage, and multiple eyewitnesses, do you really think they’re going to make up a knife?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points
*

"alleged fare-beater had charged at the officers with a knife and made verbal threats against their lives; "

The fare jumper sociopath escalated to violence and threats with a deadly weapon. That’s the person responsible here.

I’m sure you would use your Jedi mind tricks in this circumstance.

Read up on how knife attacks go down in close quarters. Theres a reason British police frequently wear knife vests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

what was the crime committed by the bystanders who got shot by the police?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Proximity is guilt, duh. How dare they not assist the police in subduing the aggressor. They got off light with just a little shooting! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The violence wouldn’t have been escalated if

  1. The cops didn’t chase them down for a measly fare
  2. The cops weren’t absolute monsters that shoot first and ask questions never

Simple cause and effect, coupled with pre-existing fear of cops because of the multitude of times they’ve shot a person dead over nothing, or kneeled on their neck until they were dead over cigarettes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes, no way to prevent this /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Maddrey said the officers followed the man, each firing a Taser which proved ineffective in subduing the man. He then exited the train while it was still at the station and charged the officers with the knife, the chief said.

What, it’s not a good idea to do that now?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Last I’d heard the cops were still looking for the mystery knife. That said, being around police in general is bad for your health.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Nah, it’s definitely the police in the wrong here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

Yes, firing a gun in a crowded subway station is absolutely in the wrong, as we can see by the three innocent people shot, one in the head. There are police forces across the world trained to deal with assailants with deadly weapons including knives without shooting them. It’s reasonable to expect the NYPD to have the same level of training and judgement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, there aren’t “police forces across the world trained to deal with people with deadly weapons”. They are trained to save themselves first and foremost. Same as firemen aren’t trained to run into a burning building heroically grabbing the puppy / family member and carrying them out. Paramedics too. This is the reality - nobody is required to give their lives up / risk their lives to save someone else’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

They tried to Taser the guy twice.

Just out of interest, what would you have done differently?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

They weren’t necessarily in the right either. They wounded a couple of bystanders in the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

They were about to be wounded themselves, by the sound of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

porque no los dos?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The police are government funded terrorists.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Cops are such fucking cowards. ACAB

permalink
report
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 573

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators