2 points

Second time in 179 years sounds a lot more impressive than they endorsed the same party they did during the last election. They broke the seal in 2020 and will probably endorse someone again in 2028

permalink
report
reply
117 points

Article on Scientific America’s site

For the curious the other endorsement they made was for Joe Biden in 2020.

permalink
report
reply
146 points

179 years and the only time they endorsed was against Trump. Almost like he’s a piece of shit or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s Scientific American, not Complete Bullshit American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

To be fair, Americans had no idea just how many of us were anti-science/ pro-bullshit until nearly the end of 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

Trump firing all those"experts" during his first term really worked out well.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

It’s gotta be a low bar. Just don’t believe in 19th century health conspiracies. You had to have been dropped constantly as a baby to believe vaccines are dangerous.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Not necessarily. You could also be a virus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Only the 2nd time is surprising considering the right doesn’t believe in science

permalink
report
reply
12 points

They used to just look sideways at it instead of straight up denial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s a wonder each of them was the respectively “fittest” sperm. I mean, fuck. I’m curious if even Darwin understood how much raw chance was involved in this “evolution” he imagined. 🤡

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s not the first sperm that fertilises an egg… The first who make it put in all the effort breaching the wall and dying of exhaustion before some lazy piece of shit sperm towards the end just waltzes through the hole and does the needful.

Explains a lot tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Is that a relatively recent phenomenon or has it been that way for decades?

If it’s the former, it might explain why they didn’t need to before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Tea Party(2010s or so) is when they started going anti-science. They’ve always been pro Christian though, so it’s a fuzzy line.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 8.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 684

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments