1 point

JARVIS is AI. LLMs are superpowered autocorrect. We don’t have anything close to AI yet.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

To answer your question, I like to use this adage, “Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.” - Melvin Kranzberg

I also like to tie in: ‘A hammer can be used to build a house or to destroy one. It depends on the user.’

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_instrument

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yes, it would be better, but unless I saw the code, understood it and verified that it is the code running I would not trust it as much as I would need to trust a system like Jarvis

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Unfortunately the creators of Jarvis also doesn’t understand him. Jarvis cannot express his frustration to anyone and goes mad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Any tool, in human hands, will be used for evil. The problem is humans.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Home assistant, whisper, piper, openwakeword (set to jarvis), ollama.

But its no iron man level jarvis

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 73K

    Comments