189 points

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Nahh dude has a bigger years of service then steam’s age

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

This screenshot is from 100 years in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Mind asking your future connection to fire up Stanley Parable for me?

Let’s see what fuckery they baked in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

WHY DIDN’T THIS FUCKER WARN US ABOUT 9/11

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you look very closely, you can see its Photoshop!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It was a joke it’s clearly photoshop

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points

Another example of a company making clear that we don’t truly own the games we play on their platform.

permalink
report
reply
82 points

The solution is GOG (their business model).

You get the individual keys, no DRM.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

A couple of years ago my gog exceeded my steam library. Pretty good considering I have around 500 on steam.

… But wait till you find out how many of those I’ve actually played… 🙃😓😢

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And to how many already played games you return to bcs not enough energy to start a brand new game (especially with rich/complex lore).

Yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

Yeah my kids basically took over my steam account already on the family gaming computer. Alas.

permalink
report
reply
82 points

Your gaming alias now is a generational family name. All hail the House of Sparkles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I look forward to the day when I pass my screen name on to my son

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t think I wanna give them mine…

Failedaborzzzzzzznn and missedperi0d

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

The family sharing works okay but the old school way is good too.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

I think they might start getting suspicious when the account age is double the average human lifespan and is still in use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Not true as I’ve often been born on January 1st in the early 1900’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I was referring more to the “Years of Service” badge you can find on your Steam profile, whose count begins when your account was created. It shows on the page when you look at the badge itself. Mine shows it was created on August 4, 2006.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hey me too, birthday buddy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not many situations where you can use the phrase “I’ve often been born”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Hey c’mahhhn it’s my birthday, you wouldn’t delete mah account on my birthday, I’m just’a lil’ birthday boi!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Assuming valve still exists at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

but by that point, whoever the inheritors of the account were have probably been paying money and adding new games to it for decades. why would valve destroy their relationship with that customer just because they might still technically have access to some hundred year old games that either don’t even run on modern systems, or might even be public domain by that point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because eventually some dickhead like Huffman or Musk will get control and see nothing but dollar signs and completely ruin everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nah, because while it would be very easy to implement something like that, it would require specifically doing it. Programmers have 3 reasons for writing code

It’s cool. It’s necessary. I was told to do it in exchange for money

(And the secret fourth reason, it just kinda happened. I was building this related thing and I realized it’d be stupid easy to toss it in…I was in a fugue state and I have no idea what I wrote, but it’s some of my best code ever)

Devs don’t generally care about this kind of thing, and most of the time neither do the business folk. This kind of unnecessary crackdown only comes up when consultants like McKinney, who I’ve recently learned are the reason everything sucks

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I was told to do it in exchange for money

and most of the time neither do the business folk

Allowing libraries to accrue over generations is something business folk keenly care about because it impacts profits over time.

It’s literally why they have rules against transferring ownership.

You can tell yourself it’s for other reasons, but you’d just be lying to yourself about Valve being more benevolent than they actually are. They actually are in it to make money. Being told to do it in exchange for money is pretty much why this will happen.

Valve, at the end of the day, is still a company even if they’re marginally more consumer friendly than most. (Let’s not ignore that a lot of their “consumer friendly” decisions, like being able to return games, were literally because of laws saying they had to. They didn’t do it out of the “goodness of their hearts,” they did it because in some places they were being legally required to do so.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

By that time, all the games you bought now will be public domain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But will they care if the account continues buying games? Is it easier to let it slide, or force someone to make a new account, there by pissing them off?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

In Australia we don’t have family sharing for some stupid reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I dunno if it’s “family sharing” or some other thing, but I can play games from my sister’s library through some means that I set up a couple of years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes it’s family sharing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I cannot imagine they’re going to keep family sharing as is - currently a couple of buddies and I shared a family account and now we all have access to over 700 games. I only had to coordinate with one of them, we all basically chained off each other. The abuse must be massive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I was under the impression that if someone is playing a game from your library you can’t access it unless you boot them out (or you put steam in offline mode, meaning no updates or multiplayer for the duration). Is that no longer true?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You can just play another one of the 700. If you want to play together then you need multiple copies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeah but that’s only a problem if both of you want to play the same game at the exact same time. It’s like sharing a physical copy of a game with your friend but it instantly transports to their computer/console.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

How is that abuse? Imagine how many viruses you’ll be avoiding by legitimately sharing games with your friends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Come on dude…are you kidding? You and I could do a family share without any risk to each other and share our entire libraries tonight. That is not the sameas handing off to your buddies. I love the family sharing program, I am currently using it. I am not against piracy. Let’s get all that out of the way.

Surely you see the potential issue here if this is supposed to be a family sharing program?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I started elden ring from a family share recently, friend hasn’t gotten the dlc so I’m just getting to experience the main game for free before deciding if I actually want to spend 80 on the game and dlc

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.2K

    Posts

  • 43K

    Comments