7 points

fs::exists() was a nice little improvement that I didn’t know about until I read this announcement.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

It’s a subtle difference between that and path::exists().

  • path::exists() == false might just mean you can’t use it (if path::exists() cannot access a file due to e.g. permissions, it’ll return false)
  • fs::exists() == Ok(false) means it’s definitely not there (permissions error will cause an Err to be returned)
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The expect lint is really great, been looking forward to that for a while.

Still waiting for more flexible const generics 🤞

permalink
report
reply

Rust

!rust@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits
  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

Community stats

  • 610

    Monthly active users

  • 243

    Posts

  • 823

    Comments