Developed by the google research time. Pretty ironic

1 point

If I’m not mistaken, zen browser (firefox fork) already supports jpgxl

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I bet Firefox is finally doing this because of the Google anti-trust lawsuit. They would always go along with Google as they got funding from them, but with that up in the air they don’t need to keytoe the line anymore.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

That would be really worrisome - like google told them not to do it “or else”, but I very much doubt it haha. It’s possible but I doubt the reasons are that complex. Hanlon’s razor says it’s just some guys playing favourite, others just not bothering to stick their neck out, and others worried about bugs and maintenance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Holy shit! Finally!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

This is pretty huge. With both Apple and Firefox supporting it, chrome will be the only major holdout, and it could put more pressure on them to add support.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

So despite this being developed by Google, they are not putting it in chrome? That’s dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The Chromium team is made up of developers like James Zern (the one who closed jpegxl’s inclusion as obsolete(won’t fix) twice) who are active developers of Avif and Webp2. Both of those formats really suck and have a lot of problems they just handwave away. Avif is constantly breaking compatability and has some bit depth jank that breaks how it renders.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Definitely a conflict of interest… >:/

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 25

    Posts

  • 21

    Comments

Community moderators