Guidelines also stipulate teenagers should have no more than three hours of screen time a day

Archived version: https://archive.ph/0293p

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fworld%2Farticle%2F2024%2Fsep%2F02%2Fno-screens-before-age-of-two-swedish-health-authority-tells-parents

30 points

I wouldn’t say that screens themselves damage attention spans or anything, but when the screen is the tool to deliver the lowest consumable content imaginable, cutting out the screens is the way to go.

This recommendation is understandable, but as with anything moderation is key. Not just in terms of how much screen time you allow, but the type of content they interact with.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Yup.

I’ve got two kids, the amount of time they get consuming content is limited, the content they have access to is only from my media server (so very curated), and occasional extras like crafting/drawing/etc when we are sitting next to them. And even that I’m moving to the media server due to the ads, which are impossible to really curate and can be very, very odd…

The physical presence of a screen being on is not an issue. Using it as a replacement for parenting is an issue. Especially under 2.

I just wish it wasn’t so much effort to manage content that other parents could do it more easily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We also have a media server, and I too wish it were easier to set up so more parents could have more control over the content viewed. As it is, I’m thinking to upgrade our machine so it can handle multiple streams both locally and from other houses.

The other parents we interact with like the concept of limited curation, but they lack the technical experience to get it set up and so they rely on Netflix, Prime, and Disney+. Maybe I’ll get around to it this winter haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s what I do, nieces and nephews. They are a bit older than my kids, and their parents are not tech savvy.

I basically have a kids library for anything under PG, and I grab common sense media ratings for a decent estimate on appropriate age, and let them go from there. Then I use tags for what we find appropriate for our kids.

Some of them still use other things I wouldn’t go near (YouTube kids, ffs that place is wild and weird), but that’s their decision not mine.

FWIW I run mine off an 8th gen Intel, igpu for transcoding (though mostly I don’t need to transcoded), on a little lenovo tiny workstation I picked up on the cheap. Storage is on my NAS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

All time with tech as a child should be limited and parents need to watch what they are doing. Just like the tv generation it is easy to let it babysit but it comes with a cost.

permalink
report
reply
-8 points

All time with tech as a child should be limited

Akshually a house is also technology, and so are wheels and toys. You want to limit children’s time with those? Hm??

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did the link provided by OP say anything about houses, wheels, or toys? If not I believe my reply was in the correct context with what was provided. Perhaps you need some time limits on your own personal tech…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you believe that when a press report uses the phrase “The White House said today…” the the announcer actually thinks that the building spoke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yesir /jk

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

TIL: Lemmy doesn’t know what /s means

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Three hours for teens? Does that include doing homework and such? At that age I was tinkering with C++, does that going as screentime?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The screen isn’t the problem. The content is.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Not the first time in my life I’ve changed position based on evidence. Not the last.

The only reason to ask questions is to listen to answers, rhetorics be damned.

permalink
report
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 4.1K

    Comments

Community moderators