One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users’ piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go “lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It’s not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don’t even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?”

1 point
*

Don’t believe that you’re always gonna be protected by some judge somewhere.

Get a proper VPN, dammit!

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

In the end, you can’t out-tech the law. You need rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Your so-called “rights” won’t hold to the pressure of massive media capital alone. It will erode away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

They have so far. It’s still legal to use a VPN without verifying my identity. It’s still legal, though difficult, to access the Internet anonymously. The local police department doesn’t blanket monitor everyone’s search history.

increasingly difficult tech solutions for privacy are a bandaid not a cure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yo! What’s a proper VPN these days? It seems like all the ones I used to trust went to shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Edit: looks like I need a new VPN…

I use private internet access (pia). It’s reasonably priced, really good for the number of devices, and I don’t believe they keep logs. At least it used to be that way, but I haven’t checked that since I signed up a decade ago. I have had zero issues with anything or anyone while using it for any reason. Uptime is basically 100%. Also has mobile support if that matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I know the feeling, I used PIA for a while but moved to Mullvad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Billion? What are they smoking???

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Ikr? It’s like they’re counting every act of digital piracy ever to be their lost profits when that’s obviously not the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

It’s not “like”, that has been the argument with these piracy cases for ages. If I pirate 100 movies, it obviously means that if I couldn’t have I would have gone to the shop to buy each and every one of them. It’s even worse for anyone caught distributing the downloads, where a site host can be hit with this logic for every user download ever.

Apparently these days they are claiming that movie and TV piracy costs the US film industry $29-71 billion a year and the US GDP a cool $115 billion in total
Because, you know, we have all that money just floating in our pockets now thanks to piracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

US GDP is not 115 billion. My tiny European country’s GDP is like 700 billion. The US’s must be well into the trillions

Edit:

It’s 28 trillion. That’s 28’000 billions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I live in Brazil, there are many problems here and stuff. But at least no one gives a fuck about piracy, lol. Never needed a VPN for torrents, not gonna need anytime soon.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

It’s like that in many countries. The USA is just kind of shit in this regard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments