“Threads is deepening its ties to the fediverse, also known as the open social web, which powers services like X alternative Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, Flipboard and other apps. On Wednesday, Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse. The latter had previously been announced via an in-app message informing users that API posts would be shared to the fediverse starting on August 28.”

87 points

Daily reminder to defederate from and block threads.net (and optionally all instances that do not do the same).

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Exactly. Proudly presented by https://fedipact.veganism.social/ and https://fedipact.online/why among others.

You can read the human rights abuses that meta is facilitating above.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

So… Instances like lemmy.world, that this is posted to?

yes, I’m federated with them as well, but shit like this is why I dislike them being so big. In the end all the smaller instances can either have strong morals and integrity, or have access to the largest amount of content in the fediverse, but not both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ehh mastodon and lemmy don’t see a ton of cross talk. Threads is mainly going to affect mastodon instances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s going to take some effort to have the necessary restrictions while also denying the “help” from major orgs in developing the software

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Maybe we should do a reverse embrace-extend-extinguish where we open everything up until the point that they start introducing ads to enshittify the platform. Then after that great migration say goodbye to them

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They can’t place ads in your feeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

they technically could do this by representing ads with posts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Most platforms (especially reddit, instagram, twitter) moved ads from ad-dedicated spaces, to authentic-seeming posts, that are actually ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s exactly the point. There are a lot of users on Threads who might be happy with the Fediverse. Threads will undoubtedly need a put in ads in their app/instance, their enshittification is inevitable. If it becomes easy for users to move over to more friendly Fediverse instances, that is a win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They can still train ML models (create profit) from the data they get from you without consent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They meant after Threads enshitifies itself and the users migrate to a proper Fedi platform then we block out Threads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Defedding from threads always seems strange to me. Everyone says it’s to protect your data from meta. But they can already get your data. Everything on the fediverse is public. They already have your data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s not about the data, but the community. Just like how Google killed IRC, big techs are always trying to embrace, extend and extinguish the services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

@Dirk @MrScottyTay Also I think that one should ask the question, what Meta could do with the data and what it is doing with the data of their users. For their users they use the usage data to present them a feed that the users appreciate. Also they use it to place ads inside of their apps. Also they use the data to serve you ads outside of their system on ad networks that use data from Meta.

All of this is technically not possible for Fediverse users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Defedding doesn’t stop any of that though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Public is not the same as public domain.

I’m not a lawyer, but Federation would probably imply consent to sharing the data. Whereas defederation would strongly imply you’re not okay with sharing the data with that entity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You think they don’t collect data illegally and anonymise it (but keep cohorts) for market research already? You sweet summer child

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

@Dirk @xelar thanks for your view, question: defederating with threads seems reasonable, but why would you defederate “second level” like this? I ask as the instance I’m in decided not to defederate with threads for now and I’m personally OK with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A is defederated from Threads, but federates with B. And B federates with Threads. Now Meta can cash out on your data via B.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Now Meta can cash out on your data via B.

Everything we’re posting is public, anyone can cash in on it regardless of who you defederate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think that’s how it works and it would likely not be legal. By explicitly blocking Threads, you make a big statement about not wanting your instance’s posts to show up there. Also from a technical standpoint, I don’t think a “middle-man” instance will push posts from another instance to a third one. You’d have to explicitly scrape data that’s not available via the API. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

@flancian @Dirk Threads has about 200 million monthly users, 33 million daily users. The fediverse has just under 1 million monthly users. Do you really think that 0.5% has any relevance to Meta?

Also: What data do you think Meta will be able to use - and for what? They can’t use this data to serve you ads, simply because they don’t know you. They can’t track you around the web because you don’t have a Meta account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s a way to force your morals on the others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Who’s the artist of the image? I like the art style

Also the scared Lemmy and mastodon :( I feel bad for them

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

David Revoy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh sick I didn’t realize it was his work, nice, thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who are these characters?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That same Meta that performs emotional manipulation experiments on its users without informing them or receiving their consent? No, thank you!

permalink
report
reply
3 points

To be fair, this is describing all advertising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Fuck off Zuck, you’re not welcome here.

permalink
report
reply

Fuck the Zucc

This won’t affect the Fedipact instances like dbzer0, right?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Nope. But world agreed to it and this could hurt the fediverse in the overall since world is the majority

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah that’s the reason why I moved away from lemmy.world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Same here. Fucking sell outs

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.ml

Create post

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.

Getting started on Fediverse;

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 267

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments