Would Starlink and other satellite ISP’s be able to mitigate some of the traffic?

114 points

Russia can’t take out all the “internet cables.” Presuming we’re talking about undersea cables, there are a fuckton of them. The logistics of taking out even a handful of those before the world takes action is beyond what Russia is capable of pulling off.

Even if they do manage to cut some, traffic would slow down, not stop. Then the cables would be repaired, and everyone would be more pissed at Russia than they already are.

It’s nothing more than bluff and bluster. It would be a minor setback for the world, and have huge downsides to Russia.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

This. Russian subs can be sunk just as quietly as they can cut cables. This is an extremely stupid gambit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

All I needed to read is the threat was told by Medvedev. The guy constantly spews crazy shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Fuck with the internet and millions of nerds with billions of hours of Call of Duty playtime will be very upset with you. I would not want to be on the other end of that rage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

…because they know how to swear in Russian?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not just “more pissed”

Pissed off beyond all semblance of rational thought.

This would ABSOLUTELY start a war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not a very long one, as China and India would both be pissed…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That made me less happy. There’s 4 chokepoints they could use to seriously damage the “western internet”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The chokepoints still cover kilometers or more.
It’s not like all the cables were run at the same time

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But still, a lot easier than I thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points
*

Almost none of it.

The amount of data flowing through undersea cables around the world is insane compared to the inter-satellite links available.

That being said, a lot of data that you use as a consumer on a daily basis doesn’t pass through any undersea cable at all. It’s more of a business problem than an individual problem.

The majority of the websites or online services you access are locally hosted on your own continent. Netflix, Facebook, Amazon, etc. all have local servers. Even for video games, most of the traffic is local just due to lag issues caused by too much distance.

What would break? Banking and financial institutions transferring money to or from overseas institutions to complete investments and loans ,Communications (Like e-mailing or calling a factory in China from the US, or contacting your Grandma in Thailand), International shipping, Flight tracking, etc.

While the satellites could take over for some of that, what would likely happen is specific companies would bid up the price for that limited capacity, and less financially valuable uses like being able to look at the latest lemmy posts from European submitters wouldn’t work.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

I think you’re greatly underestimating how many non large corporations just host their shit in US-East 1.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

how many non large non US corporations

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Wouldn’t you think video streaming would be the first to go? Also music and podcasts. First in line is critical things like banking, credit cards, etc. It’s actually convenient that the most important things are the smallest data size. The problem I see is that so many companies are putting everything on the cloud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You have to remember that the cloud is just a series of data centers owned by cloud providers. If you are Netflix, you’re not hosting Stranger Things for audiences in the US from the EU. You have a copy of it in both places and leverage AWS regions in each area to server geographically closer users (it’s typically called latency based routing). If the undersea cables are cut, the EU still watches Netflix because the content doesn’t need to travel undersea, it’s already in the EU, same thing in the US. The challenge comes in at the end of the month when people pay their Netflix bills and the banks needs to process international payments. End users are largely not impacted by direct service outages but big companies are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Beautiful redundancy. My one true love

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

I suppose:

1a. that’d be a lot of cables to take out

2b. many cables are terrestrial

3c. Putin would tick off other BRICS members and other countries

4d. ship-to-ship—maybe get some airplanes and balloons involved

5e. American Navy attacks Russian vessels cutting cables, and Biden tells Putin to stop this folly

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That is a curious enumeration strategy

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The US has been able to send bandwidth via laser beam long distances for a while. I wonder if they could set up a network this way to bypass any bad cables. Even if only while they are being repaired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Not across oceans though. Earth is curved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Even without curvature, there’s way too much atmospheric interference for that. Laser communication works well in space where there is literally nothing in the way, including ajr. Even point to point microwaves only kind of work on earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Sure sure, next you’ll say birds are real!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not just curved, but curved quite substantially, despite what your eyes may tell you. At eye level on a flat plain you can only see about 3 miles due to the curvature. The closest points across the Atlantic are 1,770 miles apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’ll just curve the lasers then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not across oceans though. Earth is curved.

/c/flatearthers

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Lasers work really well in space for secure sat-to-sat data links, but are a lot less viable on Earth’s surface due to diffraction and weather, nevermind the limits of the visible horizon for any height of a communications tower. For pretty much any scenario where laser comms would be considered, microwave RF links would likely be just as good, cheaper, and more commonly deployed and understood by telecom engineers. The only exception is when absurdly high bandwidths are needed, which is where lasers rule.

But using RF links across thousands of kilometers of oceanic waters? For that, you must construct additional pylons on floating islands to repeat the signal. Otherwise, the only RF signals that could reach land would be too low frequency to carry much bandwidth.

For reference, when the German Aerospace Center (DLR) set the world record in 2016 for free-space optical communications, they achieved 1.72 Tbits/sec over a distance of 10.45 km. Most optical systems observe a bandwidth/distance relationship, where at best, shooting the signal farther means less available bandwidth, or more bandwidth if brought closer. This is a related to the Shannon-Hartley theorem, since the limiting factor is optical noise.

So if 1.72 Tbits/sec at 10 km is the best they achieved in free air in 2016, then that pales in comparison to the undersea fibre cables of 2006, where a section of the SHEFA-2 Scottish-Faroese cable runs unamplified for 390 km and moves 570 Gbits/sec aggregate.

In short, free-space lasers are fast and long-distance. But lasers within fibre cables are much faster and cover even longer distances. They’re not even in the same league.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

A cable-cutting war will be absolutely devastating to the global economy. It’s the modern equivalent of Mutually Assured Destruction. There are few viable contingency plans.

I say this as a telecom wonk: hope and pray and vote so that war never comes.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

You’re not emphasizing the MAD part of it enough.

Russia’s threats are all thermonuclear, fuck everyone, we’re all going to die, kind of threats.

Nukes being the first, then they were saber rattling about satellite destruction, now under sea cables.

But go ahead and watch Russia cut an undersea NATO cable and suddenly have the entirety of NATO bearing down on them for starting a war. Or watch them start shooting down satellites and ruin the ability to put anything in space at all including their own positioning and communications systems and make them a pariah to literally every country on earth that might need a satellite for something.

Russia is not strong enough domestically to do much of anything. They are certainly not strong enough domestically to thrive on their own, and literally all the cards they have to play end with the entire world turning against them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I say this as a telecom wonk: hope and pray and vote so that war never comes.

All the more reason to support piracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Piracy has nothing to do with global supply chains crashing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Gonna need something to watch while the world burns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everyone is talking about this like it would be a snow day or something.

You’re right - it would be a catastrophe. I think companies that could function in any way without offshore servers of some kind would be a rarity.

The question is, exactly how much impact could Russia have. Enough that we couldn’t route around it? Probably not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I’m pretty sure it would result in the US internet being isolated from the rest of the worlds’

Which actually works against Putin since that means his troll farms also get cut off, meaning less new material for the useful idiots to keep other useful idiots freshly indoctrinated with.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

his troll farms also get cut off Why don’t we already have a hardware firewall for this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because generally where the West can extend their communications the people tend to provoke change for the better.

Cutting Russia off entirely for the troll farms is locking Russians into a Russian curated echo chamber, or a least doing that to an even worse extent than Putin is already trying to do himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m pretty sure it would result in the US internet being isolated from the rest of the worlds’

except for most of North and South America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

South America probably uses sea cables.

Ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darién_Gap

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

cables which might need be only a few 100 km long and remain in territorial waters.

(thanks for the WP link. 🙂)

permalink
report
parent
reply

No Stupid Questions

!nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Create post

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others’ questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That’s it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it’s in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

Community stats

  • 8.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 49K

    Comments