8 points

I got a report that this article is paywalled but am not seeing a paywall here. Is anyone having issues?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I can’t read the article, first paragraph gives a subscription scroll over popup.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Apparently, my adblocker fixes that. Alternatively, use https://archive.ph/VpBsk

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the backup plan is destroy russia and build new GPS from its broken parts

permalink
report
reply
36 points

It cant. Russia can’t. And there is no such thing as “The internet” there are many many different parts of it. This is just another version of “wE hAVe NuKes”

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

they’re quite capable of taking out the satellite portion….
see also: Starfish Prime

… weird how you just replied to the title of the article without reading it…

then we have no constraints - even moral - left to prevent us from destroying the ocean floor cable communications of our enemies,

they’re talking about cutting ocean floor cables…

and

In recent months, Russia has been accused of interfering with GPS navigation systems, causing havoc on commercial airline routes. As a result, flights from Helsinki to Tartu, Estonia, ground to a halt for a month in April.

nothing about nukes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Technically they could down satellites, but thats nither the entire internet nor is it a good idea for themselves. Doing that would make it increasingly harder to operate any satellite in orbit due to the prices left behind, they don’t just fall down, its a gigantic shotgun cloud aiming for other satellites.

Also Russia is kinda using GPS themselves lol.

Furthermore there is the European Union or rather Esa made Galileo https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation) GNSS is a backup for GPS (and even more accurate lol).

They do technically have nukes as well. Doesn’t mean using them is anywhere near reasonable or beneficial…

And i said its like “we have nukes” its a empty threat not literally we have nukes, you could use nukes to destroy the internet as a total. But that would cost everyone’s life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

undersea cables… the threat was about cutting undersea cables….
stfu, nobody said the entire internet….

just read the article before trying to debunk the title….

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They can knock out huge sections. Most of the Middle East was taken offline some years ago with only one cable cut. The old redundant Internet of the Cold War is long gone even within the US. Most of the rest of the world never had redundancy to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That would mean world war 3 for sure.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

if by world war you mean “every other country shares a look and then stomps russia into annihilation instantly” then sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t think this true. Russia can certainly be beat but unlike most of their potential adversaries, their arms industry is already producing at high levels and they have a large drafting effort going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wish a motherfucker would try

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 7K

    Comments