Seriously, what the fuck is this?

92 points
*

-4.25 0.25 134

-4.50 0.50 70

This prescription is 3 years out of date, if you’re ordering new glasses you should just get a new eye exam

permalink
report
reply
25 points

How are his zeroes so inconsistent.

Fucker should go back to elementary school or buy a fucking computer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Nobody should have tried to write cursive numbers. That’s just a recipe for disaster

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t know who downvoted you, but have an upvote.

Thank you for understanding. 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Those aren’t cursive. You missed the minus sign on the cylinder corrections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

They are consistent. Parent comment missed the negative signs in front of the cylinder corrections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Thank you for looking and trying your best. I’m still confused though.

Last they told me was my left eye was -4.5, and my right eye was -4.25, both with a 15⁰ astigmatism.

But what’s up with that 134? Do you really think that’s meant to read 134?

I dunno, serious legit questions, regarding the handwriting, not asking any medical opinion, just handwriting…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

134 indicates that this is a prescription for glasses and not lenses. Lenses are typically only available in increments of 10.

If that’s the case, you should get a new prescription specifically for lenses, because the spherical correction (-4.5) will also be different between glasses and lenses, because of the distance to the eye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

What’s the difference between glasses and lenses?

I need to understand this before Labor Day, I have to renew my driver’s license, and that’s a restriction on my license.

Class R - Regular Operator’s License

Restrictions 1 - Corrective Lenses

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It was written as 134. I don’t know if that’s what they intended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Looks like 13y and fo to me.

At least I think I can read the rest of it, I guess…

But am I supposed to guess on bullshit like this to order glasses online?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

I have an old lens from over 6 years ago from broken glasses that works better than my newer old glasses from 3 years ago.

Pretty sure I know my own eyes and the lenses I have available. The best lens I have right now is a prescription monocle I keep in my wallet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I would highly encourage a new eye exam. No need to get glasses or order anything from your optometrist but an eye exam.

It sounds like none of the above give you that nice crisp 20/20. I find every like 2 or 3 years my eyes change a bit and that slight change in prescription sometimes makes a significant difference before and after new vs old glasses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

My old backup lens gives me 20/15 vision, considered better than perfect.

I think I’ll stick with what I know thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I can see you’re frustrated with the handwriting on this prescription, and with them telling you you need a new eye exam. I don’t know that folks here can help any more than they have - I’ve had the same experience where Zenni or Warby Parker wouldn’t let me order new glasses without a more recent prescription.

Seems like the best way to move forward is to get a new exam, and right after verify that you can read what the prescription says. If your eyes are temporarily out of whack afterwards you could bring an acquaintance to read it, or even ask the closest stranger to verify.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

-4.25. 0.25. 134.

-4.50. 0.50. 70.

But this prescription expired 2 years ago. Get a new one.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

You missed the negative signs on the cylinder corrections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not negatives. They’re “cursive zeros”. My old doctor used to do that. Annoying as hell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why do three of the seven zeroes on that page not have those weird lead-ins? (Left axis, and both date fields each have non-cursive zeroes)

The other two non-controversial zeros are each after a “5”. The horizontal stroke of the 5 extends to the top of the zero.

Coming to the controversial ones, why do we expect them not to look like the zeroes in the axis or date fields? Why are we expecting them to be “cursive” with so many examples of non-cursive zeroes present? Why are we thinking there isn’t the horizontal stroke of a minus sign in front of them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I didn’t ask a medical opinion. I only asked a handwriting interpretation. Thank you though, for whatever it’s worth.

Would have been nice to know how to read this garbage before the prescription expired though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You didn’t get medical opinion. You got the written number. And if you wanted to know three years ago, you probably should have either posted or called your doctor three years ago lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Ah, yes, during lockdown no less…

What’s the doctor’s name again? Let’s read the paper together…

Dw R

Edit: I have no clue what her name was. Plus Walmart is shutting down all it’s health centers…

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Have you considered CALLING your fucking optometrist and asking for clarification?

Edit: after reading your other replies in this post its clear you’re just trolling. Go get another eye exam, Mr. “Perfectly Stable Eyes.”

permalink
report
reply
-13 points

Have you not heard? Walmart is shutting down all of it’s health centers…

Thanks for the positive words though, all I need is lenses that aren’t scratched to hell and back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You have a 3 year old prescription that you can’t parse. You need a new eye exam and new prescription. Walmart isn’t the problem here. You are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

God damn maybe they can’t afford it. Stfu

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Oh come on, how many people do you expect to read that weird character as a zero? That’s not common Arabic numerals…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I’m cringing at the date format “1-20-21”.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

ISO 8601 is the only way

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I filed my first complaint against a coworker for arguing with me about ISO standards. I’m an AV engineer and use YYYY-MM-DD for my print sets which he found “confusing” because most fools write M-D-YY. I told him I got approval to do it that way and it might even become mandatory (true) but he wouldn’t drop it. He sarcastically told me I should teach a class on date formats because I think I’m so smart.

We’re an international company and I’m gonna keep using the international standard for dates, douchebag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I like how this person is confused by a four-digit year as the first field, like that’s ambiguous!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

some online shops let you upload a scan of it, do that and let them decipher the code.

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

If you saw the part I censored, you’d really see how bad their handwriting was. Of course I’m not gonna share that here, but I’m staring at the paper right now, wondering what the fuck?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You’ve got a bunch of people who told you what’s written on it so no it’s not as bad as you think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because in the domain of what they’re writing, there’s certain expected values, so they’re writing can get pretty wild, as long as the technical practitioner matches it to the closest value they’re expecting it works.

And absolute worst case scenario, the technician will call the OD office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Do you know what it’s like to have two legal names, two legal birth certificates, and two legal SS numbers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

ohh i believe you lol, I had a prescription once and the docyor put something in ink on it, the pharmacist had to call the doctor to work it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply

the pharmacist had to call the doctor to work it out.

Oh god, that must have been better than AES256 if even a pharmacist couldn’t decrypt it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ask Lemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.world

Create post

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don’t post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for ‘how do I?’, type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.5K

    Posts

  • 76K

    Comments