90 points

What a time to be alive. As it seems now, I was entirely wrong, as was ‘conventional’ political wisdom. May I continue to be wrong. It’s a welcome failure, as far as I’m concerned.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

I figured there was a 1% chance of Biden dropping out, but also thought that Kamala would be a better candidate than him, but was also skeptical that Kamala would be able to beat Trump.

So…basically wrong on the first, correct on the second… yet to be determined on the third.

I did not expect the Democrats to actually do anything that would actually help themselves, figuring that they are far too ossified and out of touch.

Currently the Trump and the Republicans seem to stun locked by the ‘they’re just weird’ angle… which is amazing to me in two ways:

One, that after basically 3 decades of spewing lies and hate and insults against their opponents in the form of coordinated talking points to respond to basically every political development, they cannot handle the mildest possible form of this being used against them.

Two, that the Democrats finally actually collectively did something ‘aggressive’ rhetorically. Years and years of ‘taking the high road’ and acting morally superior to their opponents… they finally actually did something (collectively) that makes them not seem like hoity toity cloistered intellectual snobs.

That, and Mike Tim Walz is actually surprisingly relatable and charismatic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

*Tim Walz

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Derp. Thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yep, I was wearing that clown makeup too. Dems have not impressed me much lately with being able to deliver a coherent and effective message, so I was fully prepared for a shitshow of disarray if/when Biden dropped out.

It was very surprising to me how effectively they were able to leave Trump stumbling just as he seemed to be on the upswing. The utter lack of disorder around it almost feels like Biden was planning to drop out of the race all along, just waiting for the right moment… but that’s probably giving him too much credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What clown makeup? Biden was the presumptive nominee. I wasn’t pro Biden, I was pro Democrat in the Whitehouse. Trump in prison.

I still am, though I acknowledge I was wrong about who the nominee was gonna be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I personally underestimated the support Harris would get. I remember lots of progressives being unhappy with her back in 2020, due to her background as a prosecutor.

Between that and the obvious reasons Republicans would go after her, I figured it would be an uphill battle.

Very happy to have been wrong!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right there with you

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

exact same

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

May we continue righting more of PugJesus’ wrongs

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Did you learn anything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That conventional political wisdom is getting less applicable with every year since the hell-date of 2016?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah, unprecedented event after unprecedented event. Still you could’ve been vindicated if anything mildly unfortunate had happened before the DNC. Like if Harris picked a different VP, if Vance was actually in any way adept, etc. And hey, knock on wood, but you could still be right in the end – we probably shouldn’t count our chickens before they hatch.

Good on you though for being a good sport about your previous comments. I was on the “drop out” side (not that Biden would drop out, but I thought pretty much anyone else would have a better chance), but at the end of the day I kinda think we’re all talking out of our asses to a certain degree, because political science isn’t actually a science at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s a wild time for sure. If I knew senators were going to quote 4chan when discussing policies… Man what a time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s actually really great! 1000 kudos to you

Why do you think political wisdom wasn’t applicable in 2016 and hasn’t been since?

I think that’s is really one of the most important things we need to try and understand and I don’t think it’s mainly due to the Internet being a factor.

My guess is it’s moreso due to the influence of money on political campaigns, the influence of mega-corporations on the job market, and all the offshoring of jobs in the last few decades. The terrible state of our education system really doesn’t help either

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s to be learned? What is weak logic about the mainline, presumptive nominee, who is a sitting president, who one way or another was the only human being to beat trump in an election, would become the actual nominee and democratic candidate?

That is not a bad bet, or bad logic, if we are sitting in March or April.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk, I asked someone else in this thread that and they had a great answer. They mentioned how the way we predict elections has changed since 2016 (or something) and I thought that was super interesting and worth reflecting on. If I answered your question right now it might be something simple like age or someone with a better understanding of history might mention how the current level of wealth inequality compares to previous moments in history

That said, I’m not sure why this similar comment was seen as more offensive. This is literally something I try to do myself when someone I trust is wrong about something. I might not cancel em or whatever but I’ll try to understand what went wrong or maybe just stop listening to them about certain topics they’re consistently wrong on

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

For example, you could note that “only human being to beat Trump in an election” is a really small sample size. It’s equally true to note that so far, Hillary is the only Democrat to lose to Trump in an election. The performance post-switch would indicate Trump is not a uniquely dangerous and persuasive candidate, but that his opposition was uniquely weak so far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed. I really didn’t expect the quick rally. I’m even more impressed with citizens than Kamala’s campaign. It’s restorative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not a failure. These are strange times

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Honestly, I had forgotten about Kamala when arguing that Biden was the best bet. My argument always lay in, “Needs to be familiar because Trump has this uncanny ability to swamp somebody without a track record”, and I completely forgot Kamala fit that exactly in the same way Biden did - By being a VP

SO glad I was wrong, too - It was a lot of me groaning, “Oh god Biden is our best bet dear fuck no…”

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I think I let myself be misled about the urgency of having a candidate ready and the time for campaigning. Meanwhile, other countries gear up their elections in less than a month.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Many of us misled ourselves about the “obligation” or “strategic advantage” of there always having to be a two-term attempt. The fact that Joe chose Kamala as VP, and decided to retire after one term, speaks VOLUMES about why I trusted and trust him as president and as a fellow human, and how it pissed me off to hear people saying that both parties are the same.

Anyway… Joe Biden’s legacy will now most certainly be a positive one. As I knew it would be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah. He’s never going to be remembered as positively as Obama, Obama was a cultural phenomenon and remains one of the best orators alive, but he will likely be remembered as a man who genuinely held beliefs and cared about his country enough to grow and change with the times. Biden was the president we didn’t necessarily want but aren’t mad to have had anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It was that plus the “if Biden drops out it will be a whole ordeal establishing a new candidate.” It wasn’t. It was quick, painless, and even the VP choosing was relatively quick and made people happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wasn’t on board with Kamala until she picked Walz as her running mate. I was honestly going to vote for Vermin Supreme until then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine if all the undecideds went to Vermin Supreme and he actually won… better than Trump of course, but wow

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You’re still completely missing the point.

It could have been Tim Walz and no one knew his name before Biden dropped.

The “name recognition” is just bullshit.

99.99% of what neoliberals say they dont even believe, they just say whatever gets them what they want

They wanted Biden, so they just spewed diarrhea onto keyboards throwing everything at the wall hoping something will stick.

But they knew all along that Biden was the worst option, they were just willing to risk trump again than anything a smidge to the left more than Bidens 82 year ass.

Please learn the lesson this time, they’ve been doing it for decades, and show no signs of stopping

The most conservative wings of a political party almost never are on the same side of the rest of the party. Please, for the love of God stop fucking falling for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is garbage discourse towards someone who literally said they are adjusting their perspective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Thanks, your post history is blatantly what I’m talking about

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Don’t count your chickens before they are hatched. The election isn’t over. This nations racism, sexism, and sheer stupidity might be too much to overcome.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

And just because she wins doesn’t mean it goes away either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And just because she wins doesn’t mean she wins either.

There are election deniers all over the country in important places and they’re going to act up after the election refusing to certify their election results. SCOTUS could end up rubber stamping a Trump win in a scenario where it’s up to them to solve a legal dispute…

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

They didn’t know about Walz. Seriously, wtf Democrats? It seems you have a treasure trove of untapped talent but you still wheel out barely alive corpses like it is the Imperium in WH40K. Let the next generation take over. The Old Ones should step back and turn into advisors and elder statesmen.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Dems can’t dig too much into their talented and passionate base. They have to find waffling liberals more interested in keeping the status quo.

Still so much better than anything the Republicans could muster but don’t be fooled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They have to find waffling liberals more interested in keeping the status quo.

Bingo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Doing an “I told you so” on people who are happy to be wrong is pretty silly.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

that’s why i gave kudos to those people instead last month https://lemmy.world/comment/11376547

the fears were wrong but understandable. if AOC wasn’t sure there was enough support behind Harris you’re allowed to be wrong too.

now there’s great and unified energy behind the democratic party for the first time since Obama. just enjoy it and try your best to keep it up. going for an “i told you so” right now is petty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, the “I told you so”s feel like infighting just to fight your own side

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i mean there was some infighting at the time, and i participated in it saying he should drop out. other people were saying he shouldn’t. that’s infighting and it makes sense. people were in disagreement about what should be done next.

but now it’s over. there’s pretty much unanimous consensus that it was the right thing to do. now that there’s no disagreement, bringing up the time where there was, just to feel better about yourself is silly and pointless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It needs to be said. If we can’t acknowledge how contradicting narratives were fed to us within the same month, then it shows an alarming lack of cognitive dissonance on our part.

There are people on Lemmy who argued that Biden is not our best bet against Trump; they were told that Biden was the best that the party can do and that there was not enough time to replace Biden. Now, we’re all supposed to move on like that didn’t just happen.

That said, I am pleasantly surprised to see the community admitting the mistake. I assumed this post would be downvoted heavily but the post felt necessary for the reasons above.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 63K

    Comments