218 points

They will turn off the live service and make it work offline?

I don’t understand. Industry bootlickers told me it was impossible and would cost billions to implement, hurting small indie studios the most. Yet, Nintendo does it voluntarily with seemingly no difficulties.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

Nintendo doing something good consumer-wise for once and not being a dick? I’m conflicted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I would argue Nintendo does do a lot of pro-consumer stuff. Like making actually good games. It’s just their anti-consumer stuff is either so bad or just plain weird that we just scratch our heads and think Nintendo is going off the deep end. Still trying to avoid buying much Nintendo going forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Making a good game is the minimum expectation. Making an open platform to force competition to also endorse open platforms would be going above and beyond to be pro consumer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Nintendo refuse to ever be predictable

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Don’t worry they’ll do a C&D sometime soon to make up for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Nintendo might be seeing the writing on the wall and looking to see how much profit they can make with this. If it goes well, we might see more of it. Corporations hate regulation and sometimes try and head it off long before it is coming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

i mean iirc capcom already had done something similar beforehand with megaman x dive

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

You don’t get it bro, Nintendo decimated half of their net worth pulling off this miracle!!! ^^^/ ^^^s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Hi, industry bootlicker here! Nintendo is listening to their consumers. I was told corporations are evil and won’t listen to consumers and must be forced to do things by law. I much prefer consumers remain vocal about their wants because corporations do indeed listen. No government intervention required. I worry government rules could cause unintended problems that don’t benefit anybody.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

“A single company does this and while the other 99 won’t, saying pretty please will certainly work. See? No intervention required!”

Bootlicker indeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Who are the 99 other companies? Which games have they taken away?

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

This is the future StopKillingGames wants us to live in.

permalink
report
reply
47 points
*

This is… kind of weird, no? Like why would they pull the plug on an app that keeps the microtransaction money rolling?

permalink
report
reply
89 points

I have to imagine the game is no longer making enough money through MTX to staff a dev team anymore.

This seems like a pretty good way to end a live service game, though. This way your game doesn’t just disappear into the ether completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

That was the most logical answer I came up too. Its just crazy to do the right thing and make if work offline instead of just binning it like so many other live service games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, I never paid for it but I did the math many years ago, to explain predatory microtransactions, and found out that for a chance - a perfect rolled no dupes chance - it’d be cheaper to buy a 2DS and a physical copy of new leaf.

Like, there’s only so many times they can release a set or do a palette swap for a ‘new’ collection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I recall Nintendo claiming they wanted to move away from mobile again a while ago but I didn‘t really believe it back then and I‘m still skeptical now. They‘ve received more criticism for their predatory mobile games lately so maybe that got something to do with it or it‘s simply not making enough money anymore to bother with it and they‘d rather get the devs working on something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

nintendo and DeNA crates a joint venture team last year, so i highly doubt theyre pulling out of mobile, theyre just relying less on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I always wondered this myself.

I think I remember reading a while ago that apps need to be updated occasionally to comply with .apk guidelines.

This is presumably dependant on which permissions the .apk requests. So a simple calculator app wouldn’t need to be updated, but the calculator plus app, which tracks my blood pressure, how many glasses of water I’ve drank, and my semen count, would need to be updated occasionally to comply with Google’s privacy policies.

But I’m not an app developer, so don’t trust me on a whim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I see your post has a few upvotes. Therefore, I will trust you implicitly on this matter. Thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Maybe Switch 2 will be announced around than with a new AC as a launch title?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What is the game like? Basically, this is the first time I’ve heard of it.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It’s a simplified version of animal crossing for mobile, with some microtransactions to speed things up. I played it on release and it’s pretty decent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, nothing to write home about. Thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments