Personally I find quantum computers really impressive, and they havent been given its righteous hype.

I know they won’t be something everyone has in their house but it will greatly improve some services.

26 points

I personally think we’re on the slope of enlightenment - quantum computing no longer attracts as much hype as it used to, but in the background, there’s a lot of interesting developments that genuinely might be very important.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’d agree, but that slope will be a long and hard one. And the hype cycle may have many more peaks and troughs of disillusionment, from new breakthroughs, but the researchers will still make steady progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If true then when did QC have its “ChatGPT” moment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think AI is falling into disillusionment and Quantum Computers feel at least 10 years behind.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

AI is falling into disillusionment for like the 10th time now. We just keep redefining what AI is to mean “whatever is slightly out of reach for modern computers”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hahaha, I kept saying this to myself while going through this thread. I mean there is a whole wiki page on the concept of AI winters because it’s such a common occurrence - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points
*

I dunno if anyone except scientists and security people think about quantum computing at the moment.

Correct me if I’m wrong.

I’d say it’s still at the beginning of the curve. At the technology trigger phase. I don’t hear about it as much as I would expect

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah as we have seen with LLMs, unless there is practical use for the average person, nobody cares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Somewhere around 0,0 or 1,1

There are amazing possibilities in the theoretical space, but there hasn’t been enough of a breakthrough on how to practically make stable qubits on a scale to create widespread hype

permalink
report
reply
3 points

One problem with QC is that besting classical computers has been a moving target, improving exponentially for many years while QC was being researched. It’s going to be a long, slow climb up the slope of enlightenment as it reveals its potential.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Well, yes and no.

Quantum computers will likely never beat classical computing on classical algorithms, for exactly the reasons you stated, classical just has too much of a head start.

But there are certain problems with quantum algorithms that are exponentially faster than the classical algorithms. Quantum computers will be better on those problems very quickly, but we are still working on building reliable QCs. Also, we currently don’t know very many quantum algorithms with that degree of speedup, so as others have said there isn’t many use cases for QCs yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kind of like cpus and gpus perform radically different depending on what’s fed into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments