Lots of superheroes are “children of the atom” in the sense that they derive powers from some sort of radioactivity (think Spiderman or Hulk or even Daredevil) while others are just born with powers without explanation (X-Men, Thor, Superman, Aquaman, Wonder Woman).
Who is a superhero that is somehow grounded in reality, meaning that they could “potentially” make sense (either their origin story is believable, even if it has some obvious gap to make a super power happen, or their power is somehow limited or constructed in a “reasonable” way).
I guess with these restrictions, Batman would be OK since he’s got no superpowers, but he’s insanely rich and therefore can both train himself and have access to sophisticated gadgets, but can you think of less obvious ones (even if they’re minor characters)?
Thanks for reading this!
Edit: thanks for all the answers and apologies for the slow replies. I’ve had a couple of complicated days. I’ll now go through answering you. Several people made me realize I hadn’t been precise in what I meant and helped with their answers. I was looking for superheroes or superpowers that are somehow “believable” in that they’re either constructed in an unexpected way or in a way that you could almost accept as plausible
Hawkeye, really good archer.
daredevil, trained from a young age to use his hearing as he is blind.
black widow, trains from a child to be an assassin.
Mr freeze, scientist looking for a cure for his wife’s illness.
poison ivy, wants to limit man’s destruction of the natural world.
Daredevil got super powers from an accident where he was exposed to radioactive chemicals.
Hawkeye and Black Widow are examples of what I was looking for, thanks! They are normal people with extremely good training.
Daredevil is one I was kind of ruling out in my original post since he gets his powers from chemicals spilled on him, so it feels a bit like a “deus ex machina” plot device, like being a mutant or an alien or touching something radioactive. EDIT: on second thought, you’re right that it’s known that if you (unfortunately) go blind your other senses somehow help you make up for the loss of sight and so it may be believable that by chance the chemicals he was wetted with could somehow heighten his senses, so actually Daredevil is more in line with what I was looking for than I initially thought!
Poison Ivy and Mr Freeze are amazing answers! Poison Ivy is “believable” in that she’s grown immune to poison because the mix of herbs she’s taken “could” have an unexpected effect and Mr Freeze too is awesome in that he’s a scientist trying to save his terminally ill wife with cryogenics and somehow the experiment goes wrong.
Now you’re also making me think about the very first episode of the Batman animated series where a scientist researching bats is turned into one.
Your answer suggests that a source of “believable” origin stories are experiments gone wrong, if the experiments are somehow well thought and resembling actual science
Edit: updated my thoughts on Daredevil after reading another answer on para humans in this thread.
Jack Knight Starman. His dad was the OG Starman back in the 40s and invented a Cosmic Staff and Gravity Rod to give himself Green Lantern style super-powers.
Jack’s brother, David, becomes the new Starman using his dad’s costume and tools, Jack wants no part of it, preferring to run an antique shop.
David is killed, their dad is nearly killed, an attempt is made on Jack that he only survives because he had one of his dad’s Cosmic Rods stashed in a closet somewhere.
So, Jack begrudgingly becomes Starman to save his dad and avenge his brother.
That’s a great and involved origin story. Jack takes the mantle though he wants no part in it and becomes a superhero to protect and avenge his family.
It’s interesting to have superheroes who are born out of revenge, like the Punisher mentioned in another comment. I guess revenge is also part of the Spiderman lore, though it isn’t involved in what makes him Spiderman in the first place (and also isn’t shown acting out of rage, like the Punisher).
I admit to not knowing Starman enough so I don’t know if he’s shown acting out of rage (like the Punisher) or of justice (like Spiderman)
All of the Robins; Batman is basically the least interesting character in his own city…
That’s right! In a sense, Batman is very grounded as a comic book in that several of the main characters (Batman and the Robins) all are well trained people but with no super powers, so they are believable!
There is another answer below about Poison Ivy and Mr Freeze which I also liked and commented on and which (coupled with your answer) points to how much of the lore around Batman is well constructed (that is, characters and villains have a “believable” and well thought origin story)
Saitama
Ahahahah! Great answer and a great comic. Being a parody comic, no one (not even the characters of the comic book) believe he can be real since he’s grown to become a god like creature simply by doing a fairly normal workout. Genus is so pissed off when he learns about the source of Saitama’s power
I’m not super knowledged in X Men lore so feel free to correct me but, isn’t Wolverine the result of an experiment that doesn’t involve radioactivity? All the others are just mutants but he wasn’t born like that. Also there is another neuron in my brain saying Sabertooth is similar to wolverine in that sense but maybe I’m just making this up, I’m not sure.
Wolverine is a mutant and was born that way, but the experiments added the whole indestructable skeleton on top of that. The only reason he survived the experiments in the first place was because he’s got crazy fast healing as a mutant power.
However, Deadpool might fit the bill, at least in some versions. He was given Wolverine’s healing factor in the same Weapon X project. It’s actually super powerful and would kill him if it wasn’t in a constant deadlock with his cancer which is also constantly killing him. There was a comic where Norman Osborn attempted to assassinate him by shhoting him with a cure for cancer…
That’s an interesting take, because it is a plausible origin story arising from an “implausible” one! What I mean is that, according to the (admittedly not well defined) “bounds” of my original post, mutants have a less believable origin story since they’re just born with powers, but Deadpool becomes a superhero since he already lives in a universe where mutants and healing factors exist and so it makes sense they make experiments on it!
I didn’t know Norman Osborn tried to kill Deadpool with a cure for cancer. That’s a neat plot device!
I’m trying to answer everyone and you pointed out correctly something I didn’t define well in my original post: I was trying to find either “believable” powers (in the sense of being well constructed) or “believable” origin stories. They didn’t need to come from radioactivity only. The reason I was excluding mutants in my original post was that they have powers since they have a different gene, but that is a very “cheap” way of creating a superhero, since no other explanation is necessary!
Wolverine (as pointed out in the first answer to your comment) is born a mutant and later on given an indestructible skeleton.
Make no mistake: the post is not about superheroes being or not being cool because of their origin story or super powers. I really like Wolverine and Sabertooth!
