So, I’m trying to clone an SSD to an NVME drive and I’m bumping into this “dev-disk-by” error when I boot from the NVME (the SSD is unplugged).

I can’t find anyone talking about this in this context. It seems like what I’ve done here should be fine and should work, but there’s clearly something I and the arch wiki are missing.

13 points

probably the disk UUID has changed because of the path to the NVMe vs SSD. If you use partition UUID, they will be exactly the same, but the UUID of the physical disk is not cloned, as it is a identifier of the physical device and not it’s content.

change it to partition UUID and it will boot.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Definitely second this. If you’re using LVM, it uses the physical UUID for the pv. You have to update that on the new drive so it knows where the vg and lvs are being mounted to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There wasn’t any LVM involved, it’s AFAIK pretty rare outside of MBR installs (as GPT typically lets you have more than enough partitions).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

LVM is actually super common. Most Linux distros default to LVM unless you do custom partitioning. It’s not just about the max number of partitions supported by the table. LVM provides a TON more flexibility and ease of management of partitions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

So I fixed this by using clonezilla (which seemed to fix things up automatically), but for my edification, how do you get the UUID of the device itself? The only UUIDs I was seeing seemingly were the partition UUIDs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

sorry for the late reply, the command ‘lsblk’ can output it:

“sudo lsblk -o +uuid,name”

check “man lsblk” to see all possible combinations if needed.

there is also ‘blkid’ but I’m unsure whether that package is installed by default on all Linux releases, so that’s why I chose ‘lsblk’

if ‘blkid’ is installed, the syntax would be:

“sudo blkid /dev/sda1 -s UUID -o value”

glad you got it fixe, and hope this answers your question

(edit pga big thumbs and autocorrect… )

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

also, remember that the old drive now share the UUID with the NVMe drive (which is why I recommended using partition UUID and not disk UUID), so you will have to create a new GPT signature on the old drive to avoid boot issues if both drives are connected at the same time during boot, otherwise you might run into boot issues or booting from the wrong drive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I know it’s not what you meant, but I just imagined someone typing in “pretend you are a disk cloning utility and output the code needed to clone /dev/disk0 to /dev/disk1 in as efficient a manner as possible.”

Seems to me that using rdisk would be significantly faster than disk, as disk pipes all the data through a superfluous serial channel?

permalink
report
reply
-3 points
*

What does that have to do with any of this?

Are you just trying to start a whimsical side conversation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Your title mentioned GPT as in the partition table. The other user thought about ChatGPT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Thanks for translating … my brain is completely fried from fighting with this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oooooohhh

That’s why they are getting downvotes 🙂

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You need to make sure both /etc/fstab and the boot cfg are pointing to the new partitions. Since they are using uuid, if the uuid changes due to the method used to clone, it won’t find the disk partition.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

They’re identical to what they were in the original drive, I’ve verified it in gparted on a live image.

It’s driving me crazy because I can literally find this drive by that UUID in a live image, but when I go to boot the system has no idea what that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’m confused. You say that you’re booting off that drive that it can’t find. Like, this is your root drive?

But I believe that the kernel finding the root drive should happen much earlier than this. Like, you’ve got systemd stuff there on the screen. For that to happen, I’d think that you’d need to have your root drive already up and mounted. Grub hands that off to the kernel, believe that it’s specified in /etc/default/grub on my Debian system, then gets written out when you run sudo update-grub.

If I’m not misunderstanding that you are saying that the drive in question is your root drive, are you sure that this isn’t happening because there’s a reference to the drive – maybe another partition or something – in /etc/fstab is failing to find something?

Or maybe I’m just misunderstanding what you’re saying.

EDIT: if you just want to get it working, unless you’ve got some kind of exotic setup, I expect that you can probably boot into a very raw mode by, from grub, passing init=/bin/sh on the kernel command line. A lot of stuff won’t be functional if you do that, since you’ll just be running a shell and the kernel, but as long as you have a root filesystem, it’ll probably come up. Then I’d mount -o remount,rw / so that you can modify your root drive, and then fiddle your /etc/fstab into shape. Probably a live distro is more comfortable to work in, but if all you need is to get the regular system up, I’d think that fiddling with /etc/fstab is likely all you need to do that.

EDIT2: and then I’d probably compare the output of blkid to your fstab, from within the boot in your regular system, if that isn’t what you already did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m giving up on my dd attempt and trying clonezilla (a highly regarded option it seems).

But yeah, welcome to exactly what’s driving me crazy. The dd “worked”, grub loads, it starts loading Linux … and then it gets caught trying to find… itself (?)

Like the exact drive that’s missing is the drive it would have to find to even be partially operational. The other drives weren’t touched and the original drive is unplugged.

There is a btrfs subvolume and they’re both part of the same drive … but it was also copied bit for bit.

IDK… We’ll see whether clonezilla works. I’ve been using Linux over ten years, it’s been a long time since I’ve been this confused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What did you do to clone it? What’s in the fstab, or however you’re mounting it?

permalink
report
reply

I did this recently, and encountered exactly the same issue. I can’t say whether it’s the same root cause, but it might be.

The device ID for the efi or boot partition may change, and in this case you have to make certain you hunt down every reference to it and update it. IIRC in my case it was in a config file for dracut, and I cottoned on when I upgraded the kernel and got back in the hung mode.

If you know the old blkid, do a deep search in both your efi partition as well as /etc and make sure you’ve changed to the new device UUIDs.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Very interesting. I wasn’t finding anywhere what the device ID was. Everything was looking like it was copied over from where I was (at least noticing).

Clonezilla seems to have taken care of the necessary updates so if you do this again I’d recommend just using that. I hate that it’s yet another special ISO tool to keep around on a USB thumb drive, but if I’d used that from the start several hours of my life would’ve been saved 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply

In my case, it was just too many technology changes from what I was used to, and simply wasn’t familiar enough with. It doesn’t help that every distro seems to do everything slightly differently, rather than just agreeing on a standard. The egotistical NIH may be the most frustrating thing about distro builders.

EFI and dracut are both novel to me; efi I’m starting to become more comfortable with, but dracut is new and I’m not entirely sure how it works and where it puts all of its config stuff. It’s still better than systemd-boot, which was mostly a catastrophe for me; it worked fine until you wanted to draw outside of the lines a little and then you discover a mountain of spaghetti. I probably should have just stayed with grub, but I wanted snapshot booting, and grub is beginning to struggle with some of these new modalities.

Anyway, I don’t want to have to rely on a custom specialized distro, and I figured out my problem in a couple of days; I only have to screw it up two or three more times and then I’ll be comfortable with it :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you’re a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we’re excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let’s dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 300

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments

Community moderators