260 points
*

Professor was acting unethically.

He claimed there would be no judgement, and then didn’t follow through on that condition.

He also instructed the student to lie in the future.

Where is my A+?


taking a greentext as a true story

permalink
report
reply
87 points

Sounds like business ethics to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Ah yes. “Ethics.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

And the student himself acting ethically despite thinking they’re only 36/100

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The teacher sold it to a different student who kissed his ass harder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Hypothetically, if you kidnapped the prof, tied him up and gagged him until he gave you an A, wouldn’t you have earned it? Based on his example, and the voices in my head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
185 points

Business ethics is the opposite of ethics.

permalink
report
reply
70 points
*

my business ethics professor was fired for sexually assaulting a student

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Oh, now I get it. So business ethics is just bizarro ethics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Don’t you mean Blizzard ethics?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ethics as long as it’s marketable and in any other situation it’s just selfishness and how to masquerade that as marketable ethics

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

basically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

sounds like he was a master of the subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So are most, it’s either rape or embezzlement. Most don’t have access to funds to embezzle so rape is more common

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This guy looks like Walton Goggins during the reading of Pierce’s will in Community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
160 points
*

Probably what businesses really want is unethical people who are competent at lying about it, and the professor was giving anon practical career advice if not actually ethical advice.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

They want those people as CEO’s, not as workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They still want workers who are willing to lie to protect the company. There’s a reason why whistleblowers tend to be blackballed from their industries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They still don’t want an honest 95%+ ethical person in any role because it might conflict with the corporation’s desire to have workers rationalize that the needs of the corporation are more important than ethics, ie not wanting to hire potential whistleblowers.

They want ethical but only to the point that they’re willing to be unethical for the corporation, but not to the point that they’d ever be unethical towards the corporation. Basically sketchy ‘ride or die’ logic

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They want them even more as middle managers.

The CEO’s goal is to be able to say “we had the best intentions, I have no idea how it went so badly”, and that requires a bunch of layers of middlemen who are willing to do anything to meet targets

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

What businesses want are unethical people, but only towards everyone else. To them you must always be the pretty prim diamond unicorn princess who shit’s rainbows and profit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
131 points

36 seems like an accurate score for someone going to Business School.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

For the most ethical of people going to business school. Everyone else lied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

Business school seems to be the exact polar opposite of therapy

permalink
report
reply
57 points

American Psycho was a documentary.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 6.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 956

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments