34 points

Did the author come from another reality or what? This is why we need media reform so publications like this can’t stir the pot under the guise of “reporting”.

The reality isn’t even close to that. No one has ignored the far right, It’s just they’ve simply been in charge for the last 14 years, so all the attempts to mitigate their damage have been somewhat lackluster. You might as well say that the Nazis ignored the far right, it doesn’t make sense.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

This title is total bollocks.

As for the opinion if the author, I can understand their frustration, but calling for bans and mandates for political opinions, however abhorrent they may be does not work.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

That a group of people should be killed because of their religion is not a political opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The thing is, there is always sort of a truth in the middle - there are communities suffering from mass and badly controlled migration, but whenever they raise their concerns, or hold a demonstration, racists are quick to hijack it and take the reigns. I once ran a Minecraft server which had a guy who was moderately right wing run a faction. However another guy joined and behaved himself, but invited tonnes of people who definitely couldn’t, and suddenly we had a nazi bar problem at hand of racists flooding a Minecraft server.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How is migration the problem? Practically every issue in this country is because there aren’t enough people to do the jobs either because there isn’t enough people or because there isn’t enough people willing to do them.

The NHS is falling apart partly because they can’t get the staff, because they used to come from Europe, thanks to the bloody brilliant idea of brexit that’s now not possible.

Oh and of course the whole thing about not having enough lorry drivers. If you will intentionally gut the workforce.

Then you’ve got all the seasonal workers that are necessary for things like fruit picking, they are no longer turning up.

This country 's built on immigration it’s required in order for the country to function. But racist both in and out of government over the last couple of decades have decided to turn it into an issue. They’ve decided to tell people that the reason that they can’t afford a house is because of immigrants rather than admitting this because they haven’t built any for the last 25 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s because you are trying to fix a difficult problem with an easy solution that just pushes the can down the road.

Problem: We don’t train enough NHS staff

Solution: Train the same amount of NHS staff, reduce their (real) wages and hire immigrants.

The issue of shit pay and not enough education is still there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The crime they commit and the way they treat women. There have been people trying to enforce Sharia, in France there were teachers beheaded for criticising Mohammed, there were riots in Sweden over burning a book. Riots between Indians and Pakistanis. Behaviour like this just doesn’t belong in our society. Of course there are plenty of migrants who do behave and they are very much welcome, but we do have to be careful about who we’re letting in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The suffering is real but the link to migration is entirely made up.

Not enough GPs for the population? They’ve retired.

Too much traffic? More and more people own cars and the entire country outside cities is designed to require them.

No home? Councils were banned from building them in the 80s of course we don’t have enough housing.

giving an inch on the core anti migration argument is a mistake because it makes the action to actually fix these problems harder.
No action on migration can ever be enough because the racists want to kick every black person born here out, and the “legitimate concerns” crowd won’t see any improvement in their lives and will keep demanding bigger and bigger action alongside them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

there are communities suffering from mass and badly controlled migration

Communities are suffering from 14 years of misgovernment, that’s what people should be angry at, blaming migration hands the tories a massive free pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

seems to have worked pretty well for germany? considering that they are literally the origin of nazis and are now having about as many problems as the rest of europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

The simple fact is that Muslims have made themselves very dislikable.

A majority is either disinterested in their wellbeing and waiting to see the far right make their move, or actively wanting to cause harm and joining the far right and preparing to make their move.

There are comparably few left who are actively protective of Muslims.

If action had been taken sooner or is taken soon to exile antagonistic immigrants from their host countries, the far right wave may be mitigated. The ethical arguments underpinning current immigration policy are not supported by democratic consensus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’ve never heard of Anal Yst News so I’m going to assume it’s ragebait bollox

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Sounds Welsh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You Brits can take a page from the Yanks.

Let them live peacefully so then they can quietly settle down.

Nah I’m just kidding we got Nazis literally parading in the streets.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

These guys aren’t even Nazis they’re just brown shirts. Brown shirts that are far too stupid to recognize history when it’s repeating itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you’re waving a Nazi flag… Why treat them as something different?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

No one on this website what’s to live in reality. Look you might want to disagree with peoples views but you can’t disagree with what peoples views are.

Consistently since records began British people have wanted less immigration.

The way democracy works is the people get a say on their future. But consistently they have been ignored. For a lot of people Brexit was a vote on reducing immigration and that was ignored immigration went up.

People are obviously sick of being ignored they have consistently voted for the party talking the most about reducing immigration and they didn’t do anything.

People are getting desperate that democracy isn’t working.

People look at how certain cities have completed changed and they do not want that. People do not want Muslim values yet we have them. The influence of Islam in 2024 is way higher than anyone could have imagined from pre 2000. Britain somehow went from religion being less important to people to now it becoming more important.

Attacking people because they are X isnt right. But let’s not pretend this has come out of nowhere. It’s been bubbling for decades.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

It’s ironic you mention ‘reality’, since the hysteria surround immigration is largely based on misinformation and xenophobic propaganda being spouted by right-wing politicians and media for well over a decade. This has led to a highly distorted view of the scale and severity of the issue.

First off, the mass migration of peoples seeking refuge from war and other geopolitical disasters is a global issue rather than something that is unique to the UK, but even then the UK has taken in far fewer asylum seekers relative to other EU countries.

For instance:

Also, the UK population is actually pretty positive when it comes to immigration:

  • In a global survey, 55% of UK citizens said immigration was a net positive, and only 30% were in favor of strict limits.

The paranoia about immigrants causing higher crime rates is also based on a myth:

All this is to say that a lot of the anger inflaming these racists riots come from a combination of political and media misinformation and many people’s innate prejudice towards non-Europeans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I’m not denying this isn’t a problem all across Europe. A united front on this matter is the only way to solve it.

You are just taking asylum and illegal migration. Legal migration is a huge issue also. But I agree the media focuses on this a lot less and it spinning the narrative. But people want less legal and illegal migration. Legal migration is numerically the larger of the two.

Grouping immigration as all the same is problematic. Separate it by things like country and education and I bet the picture changes entirely.

But everything you said is not the whole picture. People do not want immigration they may produce less crime you might be right. But that’s not the whole picture. It doesn’t mean people want Muslim culture in the UK they want British culture. Immigrants coming over and integrating completely is not the same as generations of people coming over and not integrating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

But as I noted above, the average UK citizen is not in favor of strict immigration controls (legal or otherwise) and certainly not supportive of the recent riots.

Of those who are, the majority comes from lower-income areas that suffered the most under years of Tory austerity, which is understandable. But even then it’s really a case of the socioeconomic elites pointing the finger at immigrants rather than themselves.

As for the Muslim community, again there is good evidence to suggest that a lot of the fears you mentioned are unfounded. Surveys have shown that most feel that they belong in Britain and have no objections to integrating with the culture.

Again, the problem you tend to find is that extremists like Anjem Choudary are amplified by the press, giving the impressions that the Muslim community is incompatible with British values, when in fact the vast majority disagree with that statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Consistently since records began British people have wanted less immigration.

Immigration laws only applied to the UK from the 1970s.

And even at that point it was never a majority that rejected immigration. There was a high anti German immigration movement before the first World War. But far from a majority of people cared.

And at every point where attitudes to immigration was increasing. Economic issues were also connected.

The majority of anti immigration event in UK history can very easily be linked to increases in the opinions being shared by newspapers owned and funded by wealthy production owners trying to silence working/poor people showing opposition to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I was on about views of immigration

It did dip for a time, depending on the data, but its obviously going back up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Then don’t use terms like “records began” because that goes back to the beginning of the written word. Amd clearly since the invention of the printing press. 1960s is very recent.

Also any polling is entirly manipulatable by the questions asked. Non of the polls you post are entirly unbiased. And have been used by the very currupt press from the dawn of mass advertising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You know that immigration is the only thing that’s preventing a population decline in America and mitigating or demographic deterioration. How’s England doing on that front? Let’s see:

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-impact-of-migration-on-uk-population-growth/

Official figures projected that the UK’s population would grow from 67 million in 2021 to 77 million in 2046, and that net migration would account for 92% of this growth. In an alternative variant where net migration was zero, the population would be lower in 2031 than it was in 2021.

So unless they want to stare down the barrel of demographic collapses like China, Japan, and South Korea currently are, the right-wing Brits better suck it up and welcome their new neighbors. Otherwise the economy and all the government services that if pays for are going to collapse under the load of too many pensions and medical expenses, and not enough tax revenue to pay for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We are talking about the UK here not England, so let’s get that right. You even linked to a study about the UK! Or would you like to talk about England? But it doesn’t have it’s own immigration policy. Bad start, really doesn’t look like you know anything.

Do you know how overpopulated the UK is? I don’t think people want it increasing by 10 million in 25 years. If it increased by 800,000 I’m sure people would prefer that.

This is so much money held up in housing that a population decline would free up discretionary income. Reduced immigration could instead cause increased wages and force businesses to train more local workers which would take strain off government services.

Don’t for a moment think I don’t understand there is pros and cons to immigration. But I don’t think the UK wants 9 million immigrants from the 3rd world. Is if had a choice between reducing GDP (which is actually not the be all and end all) and decreasing immigration, or increasing GDP by reducing wages and increasing housing by immigration. I’ll take the first one.

Give the UK a choice. I’ll be poorer for less immigration because culture, housing, safety more space is more important to me than GDP growrh

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Then the British govt should be heavily incentivizing White Brits to have more children. They used to that in Canada, they called it a 'Baby Bonus". So tell me again why we “need” all this immigration again when we could just solve the problem ourselves?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There is nothing more British than having their Island invaded, conquered, and foreign culture imposed.

The Anglos, Saxons, and Jutes, were German. The Normans were French Vikings. You know the reason William had a claim is because he was related to the very British King named Cnut.

I would advise British people concerned about immigration to look to the example of Ireland, India, Pakistan, Palestine, and South Africa who maintained a distinct national culture despite being colonized by a violent and criminal nation bent on imposing it’s own culture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s probably why there are so many countries in the UK isn’t there? Because of a long history going back 1000’s of years. Maybe that’s entirely different to 1’s of years don’t you think?

I think most people think French and Germans integrate a lot better into the UK than people from the third world. We don’t have cities that are know for all speaking French, or other cities where people walk around in Lederhosen. Not all immigration is the same.

Need to look at Ireland really? No countries within the UK need to be looked at. Ireland is completely distinct from all other counties in the UK?

Ireland, India, Pakistan, Palestine. What percentage of foreign born people live there? Even south Africa will have low foreign born population right?

Ireland had riots about migrants last year didn’t they?

You think Palestine and South Africa are good examples of what a country should want to become?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wasn’t the UK one of the founding members of the EU?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No it wasn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

100% agreed. You are being down voted by smoothbrain Lefties who don’t understand reality anymore. And as for religion being less important, you’ve got that all wrong…only White, Conservative religions is Christian and Catholic, are becoming less important. In my town, the are literally bulldozing churches to build condos, while building mosques. They are eliminating the White race in our own countries, and drooling Lemmyites are cheering for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

🎶White Genocide🎶

🎵ba, ba, ba🎵

🎶Good times never seemed so good🎶

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 658

    Posts

  • 2.7K

    Comments