I’m looking at some old Intel and Pentium CPUs that are in a NUC. Are cores and max clock speed the only things that matter? Would a Pentium be good enough to run Immich? I have a i7-4790, and the NUCs I’m looking at range from a Pentium J5005 to a i3-1115G4. I do run Docker, does that affect anything?

38 points

CPUbenchmark.net is the best way to compare 2 CPUs.

Directly comparing cores and speed is only useful across the same architecture, comparing brands and different generations should only be done via benchmarks.

I can’t provide any feedback about if those CPUs are enough for immich as I do not use it.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Maybe add Geekbench, but only within the same architecture. Tests between different architectures are not comparable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is my go-to for a first look. You might want to see if the CPUs also support special features like encoding/decoding acceleration, because doing stuff like that in hardware is much, much faster than doing it in software with regular instruction pipelines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

+1, this is my first stop too

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Look at generation first. Look at ram speed, clock speed, number of cores and cache after checking the generation

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

If you just do a search for <cpu1 model> vs <cpu2 model> often times you get pointed to sites that can do that comparison for you.

For example searching for: J5005 vs i3-1115G4

gave me several links one of which was Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs Pentium Silver J5005 - UserBenchmark

There were several other sites with similar headers.

As for best one for Docker, that too you can search. Specially if you use something like perplexity.ai and you ask which of those two is better for docker it gives you a nice comparison along with which areas one is better than the other as it pertains to using Docker. Suspect you can get similar good info from using any Large Language Models (LLM) like ChatGPT or Claude.ai (both of which have free plans)

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I would avoid the userbenchmark site, the owners are heavily biased against AMD, so their benchmarks cannot be trusted

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s true for AMD/Intel comparisons. It doesn’t really matter when comparing one vendor.

But you’re right, it is not really trustworthy

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think more important is compute per watt and idle power consumption than raw max compute power.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
*

For desktop CPUs… Higher number = better. That’s it. i5 > i3 > pentium, 11xxxx > 10xxxx > 9xxx… etc. For laptop CPUs… Good luck

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s worth mentioning that with a large generational gap, the newer low-end CPU will often outperform the older high-end. An i3-1115G4 (11th gen) should outperform an i7-4790 (4th gen), at least in single-core performance. And it’ll do it while using a lot less power.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 3.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments