Not sure how long this has been a thing but I was surprised to see that you cannot view the content without either agreeing to all or paying to reject.

114 points

A common thing in continental Europe too. NOYB and some EU lawmakers are trying to make these pay-or-ok schemes illegal, but I guess in the UK you will be out of luck regarding that.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Wouldn’t this be blatantly in conflict with the EU cookie law? Like I’m not from Europe but my understanding was that it needs to be equally easy to accept or reject all cookies. Dark patterns aren’t allowed

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Currently it’s a grey area I think

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s not a grey area, it’s clearly illegal (consent has to be given voluntarily. If you can’t use the site without paying, that’s not voluntary). Agencies so far just decided to look the other way and play dumb. There are lawsuits ongoing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

UK is not EU, so EU law does not apply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Person I’m responding to said this was common in continental Europe

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

i think this one might, actually. When the EU passes a law like this, each member state passes it into their own national law, and so if these cookies laws were implemented before the UK left the EU they’d likely still be there

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

But UK laws do, which share a lot of commonality - like the GDPR

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I think this type of scheme is illegal under the GDPR, which is in effect in the UK just as it is in the EU.

It’s been a while since I worked with the GDPR, but from memory the wording is such that:

The data holder needs to allow people to opt out of data collection. The subject can request to be forgotten. The data holder explicitly cannot charge for this.

But changes move slow, and The Mirror is probably banking on nobody caring enough to complain, and Trading Standards being too underfunded and swamped with other work to investigate otherwise (which they are). If they’re challenged, they’ll just change tack, go “oops” and are unlikely to hit big fines unless they dig in.

Cookie laws are a horrible mess and always have done - the resulting consent banners are far more intrusive than anyone wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The EU is now fighting such schemes though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s doubtful - you have examples? Because if the service is based in the EU I’ll send those to the appropriate agency today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In Spain too, try marca.com, abc.es or el pais.es.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Like basically every German news outlet? And this is already being contested in courts as some German data protection agencies (falsely IMHO) ruled this as valid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Lmao even if you pay, you still see ads, they just won’t track you. What an insane monetization scheme

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Actually they still track you, they just don’t share the information with advertisers. This is hte “pay or ok” model of blackmailing users to accept cookies and tracking. More or less what Facebook did last year, but Facebook charged a price tag that was higher than what Netflix costs! In the EU, this is not what was intended, and is currently being redefined

https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2024/edpb-consent-or-pay-models-should-offer-real-choice_en

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Absolutely wild that they’re still allowed to call this “consent”

If we imagine the idea of sexual consent being given in the same circumstances, it sounds a lot like a fucking crime.

“Either you consent to having sex with me right now or you pay me a subscription fee in order to not consent. If you do that, I’ll still fuck you, but I’ll use protection”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I like this analogy; it’s provocative and it made me think about the issue for longer than I would have otherwise.

However, after some thought, I don’t think it aligns perfectly since the user can simply choose not to read the article, so there’s an option where they don’t get fucked.

In the same vein, I think we could make a better analogy to sexting. You meet someone, seem to hit it off, and when the texts and pictures get a little spicy, they hit you with a, “you can pay me now and I will keep all of this in my private spank-bank, otherwise I’m going to share our entire relationship with a group chat I’m in with 1200+ people”

I think this is a bit stronger because it hits on a few notes where the hook-up analogy falls short: sharing of sensitive information, extortion in exchange for gratification, and the potential for an ongoing relationship.

Idk, what do you think?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sadly, newspapers are not considered “platforms”. A platform is a site that publishes user generated content, so lemmy or facebook. And not all platforms are large platforms too.

So while this is a good first step, it doesn’t cover all online services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My bad. I assumed that all websites were platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“But if we don’t track you, we lose all the money we’d have made selling your data to Oxford Analytics so they can help Putin convince your uncle to vote for far-right candidates?!?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

“News outlet” might be the most generous interpretation I’ve ever seen.

permalink
report
reply
49 points
*

Is this

  🦋
💁‍♂️

Peak enshittification?

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

They can always go shittier. Nothing will stop them until the entire human population is strapped into a matrix style ad network, 24/7… paid for by you, renting your neurons as compute for AI to generate more ads and supporting analytics for yourself… until your profitability quotient falls below average and they liquify your corpse to feed a more profitable gen of the attention crop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Like in that Black Mirror episode when it was checking if you’re watching the ad and you could only pay to skip it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If I was a human smoothie would you guys drink me?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Soylent green is people! SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLEEEEEEE!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Well ok, they have no GDPR.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

German news outlets all do it. The data protection agencies have sadly so far ruled it’s ok (there are still ongoing lawsuits afaik).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Every outlet in Italy as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s standard practice in France too. This is not forbidden by RGPD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

you Frenchies and your fucked up transposed acronyms

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Shut the fuck up or I’ll go OTAN on your ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I don’t think they repealed it. And besides, it applies to EU citizens regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 23K

    Comments