If you’re a big-headed guy or gal at a rationalist puddle cuddle, double check that your rubbers didn’t get punctured.

21 points

Aren’t smaller, better-connected brains more likely to be from an intelligent person? I’m not sure there’s a relationship between intelligence and brain size in general.

Also, huge head does not imply large brain inside the head.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Our brain shape science basically boils down to:

  • missing big pieces usually makes it work less well.
  • folds and creases seem good?
  • Not too much fluid!
  • Not too little either!
  • front part seems pretty important for thinking.
  • middle too.
  • “stuff” in the brain is almost always bad for thinking. Like rocks and things. Neurons, blood and the right blend of fluids are great.
  • phrenology is pretty wrong. Like, super wrong.

Beyond that, we know a bunch of stuff about brains and neurons and how they all piece together, but just based on lookin’, we’re pretty bad at judging a person based on their head and brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

missing big pieces usually makes it work less well.

I fucking love science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

instructions unclear; adding rocks to brain for hard thinking

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No! That will probably do something bad! Or nothing, depending on complex factors we’ve not totally figured out!

At least wash it first and take some before and after images.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Tired of people stereotyping metalheads as dumb smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Based on my neurology classes, I feel like we have some idea what some parts of the brain do. Obviously full on experiments would be unethical, but we can like, observe which neural pathways formed in people with the same life style (so Taxi Drivers have larger and more developed sections focused on navigation). We can observe what happens to people who take the same kinds of damage, and occasionally we get lucky and we can see what happens to people with grievous injuries or rare maladies. Also, we can do experiments on creatures like snails which far less complex brains.

The brain is certainly an interesting a weird black box, but we do have outs to learn some things

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh, totally. We legitimately know tons of stuff about brains, including what most parts are typically used for. We just can’t tell much based on eyeball lookin’, we’ve gotta get in there with FMRI and EEGs.

I’m purely referring to head/brain size or gross physical properties and how they relate to intelligence.

Show a neurologist a photograph of a random brain and ask them to assess the owners intelligence.
The only thing they really have to go on is that if you can photograph someone’s brain, signs aren’t typically looking great for them.
They’ll be making guesses based on vague correlations, and also getting fidgety about what you even mean by intelligence, since that’s also not a simple measure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Oh, I forgot to mention that we can also do some weird experiments with rats. Teach a bunch of rats how to do a maze, or complete some task, and then surgically remove different bits of each of their brains.
Unless you really mess them up, they usually remember how to do the maze.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5001904/

It’s why missing a chunk won’t make the neurologist definitely say it’s impaired someone’s intelligence.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/03/22/1165131907/neuroplasticity-plasticity-glass-half-full-girl

It’s an extreme case, but definitely indicative of how visual examination is just not great for assessing brain function.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I have a big head (I needed to pick the bigger helmets when I went gokarting) so yes, there is a huge relationship between IQ and brain size. Don’t mock my chunky noggin please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

N = 1

Look out, this guy’s most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

uses my superior vision, no caliper needed

That you felt to point out what you think is a mistake shows me you have an inferior skull. You might even have the blood of the worst people (The Dutch, the creators of the infernal word LOL, Colonizing the sea, and Big Brother (potjandorie nog aan toe!)), in you. :P

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Soy irl

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I said please no bully, y you bully?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

@henfredemars Indeed, it is often associated with hydrocephalus, a condition rarely conducive to cognitive performance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Yay, let’s fight AI with eugenics!

permalink
report
reply
74 points

yet another programmer who imagines that having computer science baccalaureate gives him an insight into human biology. sigh.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

To have the confidence of a white CS undergrad…

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Much like a network, the brain is a series of tubes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

His “farming” idea is just eugenics

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Somehow he makes it sound even more misanthropic

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

For me, it’s the complete non-mention of uterus-owning people*, as if they are just a means to the end.

*I couldn’t come up with a gender-inclusive term for this that didn’t make me sound like a monster so apologies

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Honestly not the most succinct guidance, but here’s an Amerocentric style guide: https://styleguide.transjournalists.org/#neutral-health-terms

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This will include dudes with multiple uterii in their freezer but they’re probably outliers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What does misanthropic mean?

Also isn’t IQ in general kinda inaccurate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

misanthropic means person hating; possessed of contempt and malevolence toward humans as both individuals and a class. connotations of bitterness or cruelty

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

in an attempt to persuade normal people to take them seriously, they imagined themselves to be important enough to have their own version of bene gesserit. the sheer fucking hubris and nerve of these people,

also that “other issues that come up” means here “draw the rest of the fucking owl” but they don’t even have crayons

permalink
report
reply
13 points

wanted to emulate bene gesserit, ended doing bene tleilax

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Wait, I totally had something for this…

“Bene Jizzerit”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

thank you, that’s perfectly awful :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 364

    Monthly active users

  • 161

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments