32 points
*

Who is going about their day thinking they can beat an Olympic contender at anything??

E: aside from other Olympic contenders, I guess

permalink
report
reply
34 points

The bottom 20% of men in this survey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I wonder what the extent of “beat” in a fight means in the context of this survey. It’s gotta be something along the lines of “get injured and don’t want to continue” vs “to the death”, right? Like surely 40% of Americans don’t think that if they had to take on a goose they’d end up dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Depends how hench the goose was

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Okay, okay, those people were crazy

I once managed to fight three large feral dogs without a weapon. Didn’t kill them, but I ran them off and wasn’t bleeding.

But one goose kicked my ass because I just couldn’t do anything to it that mattered. Ever try to punch a goose? They DNGAF. There are zero fucks in their tiny heads to give. You try to punch them and they just flap harder. Try to grab their necks, they just flap harder and you miss. If I could have ever gotten ahold of it, yeah, it would have been dead, but it’s all just a flurry of feathers and beak in your face, moving constantly.

Dogs? That’s easy. Stay mobile, use your reach for kicks, go after eyes and noses. Even feral dogs will quit after a little pain, assuming they don’t have the numbers to just take you down via coordinated attacks. A single dog though? Nah, at worst you get an arm chewed up while you use the other to attack. If they’re biting, they’re close enough and steady enough to hurt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Male belief in superiority basically. A significant minority think that they personally can beat the top women in any given sport.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s generally illegal to beat anybody. But just because someone plays table tennis is not a reason to beat them people! I didn’t click on the pay wall article.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

this article isn’t pay walled. the whole community is ‘gift articles’ from NYT subscribers

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What a picture choice

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Photo editors get to have fun sometimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I absolutely can, just not at table tennis.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Depends on some definitions.

“Beat” and "Olympic"mostly

Are we limiting them to their field of expertise, or can I bring them into mine? Are they good at stoichiometry? I bet I can beat 99.9% of them at chemistry questions.

And what about the table tennis representative from Greenland? I’m probably not good enough to beat them, but I know a person who probably could. Olympics are open to any nation that has the money and wants to be represented. I remember a very amateur -level swimmer from an African nation who got the most supportive cheer for finishing the event, though they were minutes out of contention in an event decided by seconds

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Man, screw stoichiometry. A bunch of math ruining a fun science like chemistry.

That’s a joke, but also heartfelt lol. I damn near failed high school chemistry because of stoichiometry.

I got better at math in college, but dang. I’m still butthurt that you can’t learn science without maths

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I get it, it’s very much a filter subject in chemistry, after Gen chem 1 or 2 the balancing and limiting parts of stoichiometry gets left behind for actual chemistry. But you need to know how to crawl before you can make really nasty smells… Wait that’s backwards…

permalink
report
parent
reply

New York Times gift articles

!nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

Create post

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

Community stats

  • 309

    Monthly active users

  • 505

    Posts

  • 957

    Comments

Community moderators