Give Ukraine hundred more tanks and jets and throw in some navy ships too.
Singing america n ukraine fuck yeah!!!
It’s important to cover the eyes of birds when transporting them so they think it’s night and sleep through their journey.
I’m delighted we’re sending these over to Ukraine (though it should have been done a long time ago).
Question: the F-16s are planes. Is there some reason we’re loading them onto other planes for transport instead of flying them over?
The maximum range for the F16 in “ferry” mode (max fuel, no weapons, pee before takeoff) is something like 4000km. The distance from Belfast (Maine) to Belfast (the original) is 4500km.
That would mean air to air refueling, which is expensive and risky. It would put major wear on the planes, which are not the newest to start with. And unlike the Antonov, the F16 comes with neither legroom nor bathrooms.
the F16 comes with neither legroom nor bathrooms.
But at maximum speed, it could in theory cover the 4500km in just over 2h (but probably with worse fuel economy and less range)
pee before takeoff)
Iirc the factor that limited early nuclear submarines the most from continuous dives was the toilets, they have limited storage for sewage and it turns out that draining those with a greater outside pressure is a pretty difficult task, at least if you want to stay undetected.
Now that they have figured that out the limiting factor is food.
You didn’t explain how they sorted it out so I’m assuming compost toilets or some form of slow torpedo that makes it look like the sub is pooing.
It does mean significant operational downtime: https://www.technology.org/2023/01/02/did-you-know-f-16-fighting-falcon-needs-17-hours-of-maintenance-for-every-hour-of-flight/
It’s safer for long distances, plus they won’t have to worry about refueling.
Ease of transfer (one pilot vs multiple for a looooong flight, probably no refuel on the Antonow, and if so it eats less specialised stuff than the F-16s) and maybe even fuel efficiency, I would guess.
Also, one cargo plane raises less eye brows than a flock of fighters.
AN-124’s are extremely inefficient - it’s probably stopping 2-3 times on route, but still easier to arrange than flying each plane.
Oh hell yeah, are we pulling some stuff out of AMARG? I didn’t realize we were doing that!! Thought it was just a handful of European countries donating airframes they were decommissioning.
What is AMARG?
and what implications does it have? Greater number if aircraft available?
The boneyard: http://www.amarcexperience.com/ui/index.php
Has tons of mothballed airframes that technically serve as a strategic reserve in the event that we suddenly need a few hundred more military aircraft for some reason.
I’ve seem what happens to shit that sits for a while. It breaks in ways beyond comprehension.
I had to look it up as well “The 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (309 AMARG) is a one-of-a-kind specialized facility within the Air Force Materiel Command structure.“
Dunno if it the only one or not
https://www.dm.af.mil/About-DM/Units/Mission-Partners/309-AMARG/
