-5 points

airlines would be required to seat parents and kids 13 and younger together free of charge when adjacent seating is available at booking.

They should even go further and require to move other passengers if neccessary, so that the families can sit together always, no matter what.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What happens when the only way to seat a family together is to break up another family. What if you need to separate a couple who is engaged and traveling together?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I would be sad if my wife and I got split up to accommodate a parent and child. But we’d get over it because we’re adults and the parent/child need adjacent seats more than we do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

separate a couple who is engaged and traveling together?

we call those people adults and understand that they have less requirements than children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Fuck that noise. Plan ahead. I’ll repeat what someone else said. Parents shitty planning doesn’t become my problem. I pick the seat I want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. Removing fees for parent and young children makes sense, but if I’ve paid extra to choose my seat I’m not OK with being moved for someone else’s lack of planning. Not my parent and not my kid so my life doesn’t revolve around them. If someone were to ask me if I could move in that situation that’s one thing. But even then it would be well within my rights to say no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Would that couple want to sit next to an unattended child bc the airline refused to keep the family together?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think the answer would be to find another flight instead of breaking them up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What happens when the only way to seat a family together is to break up another family.

Then their software may be clueless, so it needs some Natural Intelligence [tm], and maybe even an experienced person to solve that.

I am sure there will be a way. Most planes can carry more than 2 families.

What if you need to separate a couple who is engaged and traveling together?

They are going to survive ;-)
No problem at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The family would also survive if they don’t get to sit together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Settle it in the Thunderdome!

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Don’t airlines usually charge a bit extra to pick your own seat? I’d imagine/hope that there are enough people selecting the cheaper “whatever” option that they’re going to bump one of those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What I would not like is for a parent to pay for the upgraded seat next to me and then I get bumped to accommodate their child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Nah, that ain’t it. If I book my seat and then find out that I got moved for a kid, I’ll be pretty annoyed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

being surrounded by entitled twat passengers who think the world is obliged to accommodate them is one of many many reasons i refuse to ever fly again

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why? Can people not sit apart for a few hours? I agree with no charging but moving because you didn’t book in advance with enough time to sit together shouldn’t result in others being inconvenienced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

People…as in children? you want a toddler to sit by themselves for a few hours?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

This specific thread is responding to this comment, not the original article:

They should even go further and require to move other passengers if neccessary, so that the families can sit together always, no matter what.

Which is maybe why there’s a big disconnect between you and all the comments you’re replying to

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I agree to an extent. It would be beneficial if they could book any AVAILABLE seats together for free. This practice should be standard for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Do not move my fucking seat without my consent. I booked early to make certain I could have it. The families can take another flight. Fucking hell. Flying is miserable enough already without being shuffled into a middle seat because of someone else’s problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Disagree. I have a four year old and have flown with them. I made it a point to select for seat reservations when booking everything. That’s my responsibility and someone else shouldn’t lose their selected seat because I planned poorly.

I’m not entitled to someone else’s seat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Why is this something that needs to be mandatory by law? Some airlines voluntary do it, and there is usually more than one airline to choose from unless you’re flying to a really small airport. Recently I flew on an airline that charged $50 for carry-on luggage (I didn’t bring any because it was cheaper to buy new clothing when I arrived) and $5 for a glass of water. I deliberately chose this airline because it was the cheapest. I like having the “lowest price but we deliberately treat you like shit” option available if the alternative is paying even a little more and apparently lots of other people do too. I don’t want to lose it.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Next stop, you’ll be defending having the option of “even cheaper but they may have skipped some security and safety checks on the plane”… I DoNT waNT tO LOse iT!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Possibly I would defend that option. Flying is so safe that even a large increase in relative risk corresponds to a tiny increase in absolute risk. Absolute risk rather than relative risk is what matters to me, so maybe I would choose to fly on an airline that was, say, twice as dangerous in order to save fifty bucks. I suspect that the FAA prioritizes safety over cost savings significantly more than most consumers would if given the choice.

(And I might even pay more to fly on an airline with reduced security.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You sound like you could be the Boeing CEO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

so maybe I would choose to fly on an airline that was, say, twice as dangerous in order to save fifty bucks

so your life, as per your own evaluation, is worth about $50 savings… good to know, now I can value your opinion based on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

13 only? I’d like that option all the way to 18. 1) 14 year olds can be harassed or taken advantage of. 2) If I’m legally responsible for their behavior, I want to be nearby.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

So I don’t get all this. Everything I buy tickets, I choose my seats unless I fly southwest. And even they are going to move to assigned seats.
Is this a new thing that you don’t get to pick your seats on some airlines? And if so, do they not seat everyone in your reservation together?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Seat selections are extra most of the time. If I’m traveling on a budget the cost of the seat is the same as a meal so I don’t pick it

The worst offender is Turkish airlines that charges $40 per person per leg of trip, so I’d need to pay $160 to pick seats for my upcoming trip to SEA

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

So I don’t get all this. Everything I buy tickets, I choose my seats unless I fly southwest. And even they are going to move to assigned seats.

At least when my kids were young, you’d have to pay extra to pick a seat, at least if you purchased through Expedia or Travelocity.

And if so, do they not seat everyone in your reservation together?

You know how you print your boarding pass and it has your seats? When my kids were young on multiple trips via United, AA and Delta, the boarding pass would not have a seat assignment and we’d have to go the gate agent at every gate, even on the same airline if it was not a direct flight and get our seats assigned last minute. So no, we weren’t always seated together. On one flight, none of us were in the same row with anyone in our family.

Since we were scraping by back then we always booked months in advance for cheaper tickets. I thought originally it was a fluke with just United but after the next trip, I had learned to pay extra and pick seats ahead of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That has to be seriously outdated before digital tickets. I’ve been flying United with kids for 16 years and haven’t had to pay extra to pick seats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

United only instituted a family seating policy last year so that people with kids under 12 could freely pick seats next to each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do you have a source on SW moving to assigned seats? That’s devastating news to me :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Early next year.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/southwest-seating-change-what-it-means/

There’s hundreds of stories on this, not sure what the best news source is for this info, but there’s a ton.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Lately, airlines tend to separate travellers who reserve together, probably so they’ll spend extra to change seats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You’ve never flown budget airlines like Frontier, Spirit then. They’ll charge you $20-$100 to pick seats (per seat)

And also even on mainline carriers like American/Delta with Basic Economy fares they do much the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Even now on a major like Delta: pay to pick a seat. Pay more to sit next to your kid

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Makes sense. Otherwise, the flight attendants end up having to ask for volunteers to play musical chairs to make sure they have a place to sit together.

permalink
report
reply

Uplifting News

!upliftingnews@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today’s news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity’s capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else’s big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 295

    Posts

  • 2.6K

    Comments