41 points

The drone fired an RPG or the drone crashed into the copter carrying an RPG? THE PHYSICS.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

If the picture is accurate it would have to have crashed into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

save a lot of money if you just have a grenade and propel it yourself

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Good luck hitting your target. With the drone even if you miss you can fly it back to safety until there is a new target too. Neither is meant for this type of combat and this case was probably just luck and an opertune target. The drone probably wasn’t launched specifically to take out the aircraft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The invention of the suicide bomber (circa 2024, colourised)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Doesn’t rpg literally stand for rocket propelled grenade

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yup

Kind of amazed the drone was going fast enough to trigger the impact fuse. but no propellant so couldn’t be fired

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Presumably they tamper with the charge so a fast impact isn’t needed. Y’know, because what would be the point otherwise, regardless of the target.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Drones are going to change future warfare so much. Big ships, fortifications, and slow planes/choppers are going to be very vulnerable imo

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Up to the time we develop an effective counter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Like this? https://eos-aus.com/defence/counter-drone-systems/slinger/

I like that this system uses bullets against drones, rather than massive generators and microwaves

I expect drones are going to need IFF soon

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

But it’s enough of a game changer that large and emplaced targets will be overwhelmed. Watching those drone shows and their ability to communicate with each other like a hive mind blew my mind thinking about that from a military standpoint. I think it will be like stealth technology and radar. Most planes are not stealth so old radar is still effective. Some things will be able to protect themselves from drone attacks, but most will be vulnerable in one way or another. I’m just a military gamer and I can think of hundreds of types of drones I’d create if I was planning for a defense or attack, the experts have likely thought of those and thousands more; diggers, crawlers, flyers, dummies until signaled, attaching things coming in and out from ground, air, etc, and on and on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I remember basic designs being bought out by governments in 2007 when I was following development, so yes, there are years of work already into this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Neal Stephenson’s The Diamond Age has a “forcefield” of anti-personnel drones around one compound. They form a dome and drift into one another to share power from the ground.

I don’t remember if there’s a reason they’re not just wirelessly charged, aside from mass air-to-air refueling sounding cooler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

would USA helicopters got shot down by the drone too?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

A helicopter will crash if you just look at it wrong. I’m not quite sure why this is surprising to a lot of people.

Just because a helicopter can go faster than a drone, doesn’t mean it’s always going faster than a drone. The benefit of vertical take off is that you can land and pick up troops in dangerous areas.

More than likely this is the same scenario as whenever they shoot down one of ours with an RPG in Afghanistan. Got them right after touch down or take off, or got a lucky hit while they were flying low and slow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A helicopter will crash if you just look at it wrong. I’m not quite sure why this is surprising to a lot of people.

People really don’t seem to understand how ridiculously flimsy helicopters can be. There’s a reason why they’re often called flying death traps by anyone who has to regularly be in one

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yup, and a second rotor just adds another way to die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeap, only thing worse than rotary aircraft are apparently tiltrotar aircraft. The V22 is trying it’s best to be the most dangerous thing in the air in the worst way possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

People who answer you won’t know what they’re talking about.

People who know what they’re talking about won’t answer you.

Repost your question to the war thunder forums if you want it answered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

With citable sources even!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

would USA helicopters got shot down by the drone too?

I would guess so.

If we had a sensor package that could reliably detect FPV drones out there, I suspect that it’d be getting mass-produced and sent to the Ukrainians.

A helicopter can go faster than an FPV drone, so as long as it’s in the air, and has a bit of warning, it can just outfly the drone; the drone can’t catch up. Maybe multiple drones simultaneously coming from all directions, especially if there’s also heavy air defenses that prevent the helicopter from climbing, could still bring down a helicopter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“A bit of warning” is probably overselling the acceleration of a traditional rotorcraft. You can’t safely get four tons of anything moving quickly using the same mechanism keeping it off the ground. Compare that with minimalist disposable quadcopters, with their zero-to-top-speed profile of “holy shit, where’d it go?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

We would offer the drone $2,200 and it would come work for us

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Shit I had that on my Bingo card so many times in the 2010s I stopped putting it on there.

Dammit.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

$1000 drone? likely less than 500$ even for a consumer, and ukraine does have some of its own production setup to drive costs lower.

permalink
report
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments