Reddit CEO Steve Huffman is standing by Reddit’s decision to block companies from scraping the site without an AI agreement.

Last week, 404 Media noticed that search engines that weren’t Google were no longer listing recent Reddit posts in results. This was because Reddit updated its Robots Exclusion Protocol (txt file) to block bots from scraping the site. The file reads: “Reddit believes in an open Internet, but not the misuse of public content.” Since the news broke, OpenAI announced SearchGPT, which can show recent Reddit results.

The change came a year after Reddit began its efforts to stop free scraping, which Huffman initially framed as an attempt to stop AI companies from making money off of Reddit content for free. This endeavor also led Reddit to begin charging for API access (the high pricing led to many third-party Reddit apps closing).

In an interview with The Verge today, Huffman stood by the changes that led to Google temporarily being the only search engine able to show recent discussions from Reddit. Reddit and Google signed an AI training deal in February said to be worth $60 million a year. It’s unclear how much Reddit’s OpenAI deal is worth.

Huffman said:

Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for, which has put us in a position now of blocking folks who haven’t been willing to come to terms with how we’d like our data to be used or not used.

“[It’s been] a real pain in the ass to block these companies,” Huffman told The Verge.

422 points
*

Honestly, any platforms hosting user-generated content who use the legal argument that they only provide hosting and aren’t responsible for what their user post shouldn’t also be able to sell the same data and claim owning any of it.

Otherwise, take away their legal immunity. Nazis or pedophiles post something awful? You get in front of the judge.

edit: typo

permalink
report
reply
179 points

Exactly this. You can claim that their scraping is abusing your servers, but the moment you claim copyright for the content of the site, then you give up your Section 230 rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

You’d also probably lose a whole lot more processing power trying to stop the crawlers vs just letting them have API access with some sort of limit to queries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Eh, not really.

I block bot user agents to my Lemmy instance, and the overhead is pretty negligible for that (it’s all handled in my web firewall/load balancer).

Granted, those are bots that correctly identify themselves via user agent and don’t spoof a browser’s.

It’s also cheaper and easier to add another load balancer than size up or scale out my DB server to handle the bot traffic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t think they actually block malicious bots, the change they’ve made is just to the robots.txt, they don’t have to do anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good point!

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Can’t sell something you don’t own.

So if they’re selling the parts people want, they need to own the parts no one wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Well, you can give money to Reddit for a piece of paper, but unless Reddit is claiming copyright to the content posted there, then they can’t sue anyone for not paying. It would be very interesting to see the text of these “licensing agreements”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They’re not claiming copyright. They have a perpetual, non-revokable license to the content, granted by the people who use their site when they post the content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

What if I had an agreement with MS that they can scrape my data and anything I post online?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What if I had an agreement with MS that they can scrape my data and anything I post online?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

What if Microsoft updated their Windows EULA to state that all users agree to allow MS to scrape their online data (if they haven’t already), and then take that to court against reddit? It would certainly be an interesting court case to watch, especially if they could get actual users to stand up in court and confirm that they did indeed approve of this. And it might settle the issue once and for all regarding companies trying to block freely-visible internet content just because someone scraped the info.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

And yet reddit is happy to make money off our content for free.

Or at least it did. Personally I overwrote and deleted all my content a while back.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

You think that Reddit didn’t already have the previous content saved?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Bingo, the only winning move is not to play at all and stop using Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep that’s how it works. Older content past a certain date is cached which is why you can’t comment or post on some old posts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Everyone always says this like it’s some kind of gotcha, but all of my nuked posts still have my “fuck you, reddit” content and haven’t been reverted. It’s been nearly exactly a year.

Maybe reddit has an offline copy of my old content and that of others somewhere, but if so they’d be handing that directly over to whoever under some kind of agreement – that certainly wouldn’t be the subject of any kind of site crawling which is the crux of the issue here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’re ignoring the idea that they could still be working on a way to restore content and haven’t completed that process yet

Or that they could start feeding your archived (not cached) data directly to the AI companies anyway for a price

IMO, you can win by jamming your “transmissions” with noise. It’s easier to hide in noise as noise than it Is to be silent IMO. Muddy the waters as it were

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I certainly wasn’t implying that they were going to revert your comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

it never was deleted, all that happened is that an extra line was added to a database that said “comment 65432426542654 now should be displayed as “fuck you, reddit” rather than the original text”. The original post is still in an earlier row available to reddit, it just isnt being displayed on their web page.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

i went looking for old comments and posts i had made after i overwrote then wiped them. They’re still gone. i looked again several months later, and they were still gone.

so, unless reddit did a massive restore of everyone’s comments/posts except for my 4 accounts, then i don’t believe they did it at all except for a select number of top contributors who deleted their content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As I said in another comment, I was not suggesting that Reddit would restore your comments to public view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You are assuming edits overwrite existing content. Instead of overwriting, they could just store the edited post as a new entry in the database with a higher version number. Then, you only show the latest version of each post to the end users while keeping the older versions available die Reddit’s own use.

In fact, it is extremely likely they do this. It is basically a necessity if you want to be able to properly moderate a site like Reddit. Otherwise you could simply post spam or unsavory content, and then overwrite it with something benign an hour or so later, before there were enough reports and a moderator would have gotten a chance to review it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It seemed to happen to some people but I wouldn’t be surprised it it was just some sort of coincidental database fuck-up

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

On the other side of the same coin: When I mass edited my comments before quitting Reddit, I got site-banned. Basically, my first account’s automated edit got me auto-banned from several subs with pro-spez mods. Some subs had set their automod to detect when people were using the more popular methods of auto-editing, and set the automod to ban for using them. Then when I did the same with my second (and third, and fourth, and fifth, etc…) account, it almost immediately got site-banned for ban evasion.

Basically, account 1 was banned from a sub, so when account 2 started doing the same thing on the same IP address, it was flagged as ban evasion. And ban evasion is one of the few things that will get you banned site-wide instead of just from a specific sub.

I went back and checked a few months ago, and all of those site bans were lifted and the edits were undone. Likely because a site ban prevents the comments from showing up (which hurts Reddit’s bottom line, because they show up as a bunch of [removed] comments instead,) but also prevented any of the edits from actually being published. So when they lifted the site ban (to get those old comments to show back up again) it was as if I had never edited them at all. I had probably a million karma spread across my various accounts. I was extremely active at one point, so Reddit had a direct incentive to unban those accounts with literal thousands of comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They aren’t making money off my content anymore/in the future

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Reddit is dying anyway.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

In all the ways that matter, it’s already dead. Once something enshittifies beyond a certain point, is its zombified, shambling corpse really considered “alive” anymore?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s Digg v…5 6? v5 would be when they inflated all post scores and stopped showing upvotes and downvotes separately.

v6 is… gestures to the all of it

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s easy to say this as someone who is “on the other side”. But the data doesn’t really back up that statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I don’t have data, but the quality of the content certainly seemed to be declining, even as the quantity went up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think autocorrect might’ve gotten you: You posted “quality” twice in a contradictory way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s awful. Politics is unavoidable at this point, and the amount of general anger on the platform is crazy.

People love watching their videos of people getting TBIs… Or getting too excited about a “justice served” post where a woman gets hit.

It’s kinda nice to see someone get their comeuppance, but then you look in the comments and there are just weirdos saying stuff like “glad that bitch got hit”, like… wtf?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 91K

    Comments