Barcelona, Venice and Amsterdam are among Europe’s favourite travel destinations and benefit greatly from tourism. However, the massive influx of visitors places a considerable burden on the cities and their inhabitants.

To counteract the negative effects of overtourism, these cities are taking decisive action. Following public protests, no new hotels may be built in Venice and cruise ships will have to use other moorings in future. Amsterdam has banned guided tours of its famous red light district in order to protect local residents. Paris is planning to ban coaches from the city centre in order to improve the quality of life. Other overcrowded cities are also trying to control the situation through various methods.

Do you think that overtourism is a serious problem in Europe?

Sources: National Statistics Offices, Statista, Le Monde, Forbes

5 points

Is that the total number of tourists in an entire year?

Or at a specific time?

Because that is a huge difference.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Yes, but without the tourists, who keeps your restaurants open, etc? It’s not like locals eat out every day of the year. There’s only so many times they will go to the museum.

It seems tourists are just the latest in a huge line of things we’ll blame before figuring out that we just haven’t built enough housing in popular areas for all the people that want to be there. That we haven’t bothered to invest in things outside the capitals to try and make people want to be there instead.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Pehaps, and I might be crazy, but hear me out, there just might be some room between absolutely no tourists at all ever and being flooded by literal millions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Are you really being flooded by “literal millions”? Most of these places will have in the tens to hundreds of thousands of tourists at any one time. That’s no different from having that many residents, only they’re spending a lot more money.

You can’t afford to live there, but that’s not the fault of tourists or the immigrants or the landlords any of the other things you choose to blame. It’s because you’ve decided to pointlessly centralise your economy into a select few physical locations. Why do you want to live there? Why are you contributing to the problem? It’s not always somebody else’s fault.

You’re not in traffic. You are traffic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would love to see the numbers for Annecy. That place has become hell, I absolutely loathe it, but it really breaks my heart to see how fucked it has become.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Wow, our smallish city got 33.9m tourists during the pandemic. The only thing that really annoys me are the tourists going up the bike lanes the wrong way. There are arrows every 40 feet, guys. Move one street over, and you are on the right PBL. :P

That said…god, I’d love our city banning or severely restricting cars on most roads.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

England?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

US, in this case

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m positively surprised to learn that there are bicycle lanes in the USA. Well done!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Remember residents live there 365 days a year. Visitors are typically 2-3 days.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Yeah without context on the numbers (like the time window) it makes the visualization instantly suspicious.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 630

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments