Yes this is a Telegram client and yes it will break the Lemmy’s downvote world record but I still find this one very nice and “actively” maintained. There are not many good Telegram FOSS forks without Google integrations and similar stuff out there.

20 points
*

Looks interesting. I don’t fully understand how unified push works, though. I’m I right in reading that the author have set up an UP server themselves?

Yes this is a Telegram client and yes it will break the Lemmy’s downvote world record

Because most people live in a echo chamber. Just ignore them.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Thank you for your comment. Since I deactivated Google Play services, I don’t get notifications on many apps. I didn’t know there were alternatives. Unfortunately, the app server must be compatible, but if I can have it at least for Telegram with this fork, it would be a good start. I’ll take time to compare the different alternatives and see if other push servers are compatible with more apps.

For what I understand, there are self hosted push servers, like NextPush that works on Nextcloud, and some that provide you a server, liked ntfy. For the latter, you have to check the privacy policy to see if it’s better than the default Google firebase server.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, it means you need to set up your own server.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I used this client recently and found it decent. Though for some reason, Google Play Protect always(wrongly I assume) picks it out despite downloading from F Droid.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

do any of these forks support E2EE? I don’t mean the OG “private chat” thingy that Telegram supports.

I mean like an add-on, the way pidgin had an OTR plugin that enabled private comms over Google’s unencrypted XMPP servers.

as a consequence, that would also encrypt everything in the cloud and prevent your chat history being ingested for LLM training and whatnot.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

That would require the other user to use the same app as you right? Could be interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At that point why not use a different app that supports E2EE natively?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

because Telegram’s UI/UX is second to none; possibly iMessage or whatever it’s called is close, albeit with way limited functionality. Signal and friends look like a PoC from 2015 in comparison. also the apps, on mobile and on desktop, have a low memory footprint with no bloated electron crap, the cross-device sync is phenomenal and there’s the virtually unlimited cloud storage. if an addon could piggyback off of that, that would be spectacular.

however, OP’s insight as to this being against ToS is obviously a deal breaker. seeing as how they’re adamant about leaving all your shit unencrypted in the cloud I’m looking for other havens, begrudgingly; I’ve been a user from the early days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

well yeah, just a simple private/public key solution for encrypting chat and cloud. transfer your private key to a forked desktop app and access your encrypted chat history from there as well.

just basic stuff, not something for people running from nation-state actors, but to prevent LLM ingestion and mass surveilance. but OP says that’s against Telegram’s ToS, so no dice here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

E2EE is prohibited by Telegram’s TOS (you can’t make any feature that requires users to use your client to access it).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Whoa, they not only won’t implement it, but will work on not letting anyone else do it. They’re more shady than I thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’re not shady. They just don’t want to lose the market share and I think if they made Telegram really secure, there’d be even more illegal stuff on it and the government wouldn’t like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I would strongly recommend libaxolotl/OMEMO over OTR, far stronger algorithm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Using it for some months

permalink
report
reply
3 points

What are you using for the Unified Push setup? I tried using ntfy and could never get notifications to come through on GrapheneOS

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I use ntfy and have no problems. It’s very reliable. No idea about graphene though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Have you tried changing server? The default server is overworked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I use LineageOS without any gapps and notifications often work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does it have tools to easily remove deleted accounts from groups? Or selecting several contacts from your contact list and deleting them? Because those are big features missing from telegram

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I think you want a CLI client for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For the group thing, I would expect at least a way to search/filter those accounts while looking at the group’s participants, even if I do have to manually remove them. Having to endlessly scroll a list with no apparent order is not fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m not familiar with any clients that have the feature. Make that feature and a merge request yourself I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 893

    Posts

  • 6.7K

    Comments