Edit - This is a post to the meta group of Blåhaj Lemmy. It is not intended for the entire lemmyverse. If you are not on Blåhaj Lemmy and plan on dropping in to offer your opinion on how we are doing things in a way you don’t agree with, your post will be removed.

==

A user on our instance reported a post on lemmynsfw as CSAM. Upon seeing the post, I looked at the community it was part of, and immediately purged all traces of that community from our instance.

I approached the admins of lemmynsfw and they assured me that the models with content in the community were all verified as being over 18. The fact that the community is explicitly focused on making the models appear as if they’re not 18 was fine with them. The fact that both myself and one a member of this instance assumed it was CSAM, was fine with them. I was in fact told that I was body shaming.

I’m sorry for the lack of warning, but a community skirting the line trying to look like CSAM isn’t a line I’m willing to walk. I have defederated lemmynsfw and won’t be reinstating it whilst that community is active.

1 point
*

the same community (adorableporn) is also on reddit btw with 2.2m subscribers.

i have no grand moral opinion on this type of content. for me it is the same as femboy content for example, where people also push for a youthful, girly aesthetic.

as long as the content is made by consenting verified adults, i don’t care.

it’s like adults cosplaying with japanese school uniforms or calling your partner “mommy” or “daddy”.

probably not the best move in terms of sexual morals for sure, in the grand scheme of things tho this is just how people express their sexuality i guess.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

it’s like adults cosplaying with japanese school uniforms or calling your partner “mommy” or “daddy”.

No, it’s not, because no one mistakes those things for actual underage children

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

i had no problem distinguishing the models on the community from children.

maybe it’s more difficult in some cases without looking for the onlyfans link or sth similar of the model somewhere in the post, but that’s just human anatomy.

that’s why the guy at the gas station asks for my ID card, because it is not always super clear. but apparently clear enough for reddit admins and PR people from ad companies.

i agree playing into the innocent baby aspect is probably not great for sexual morals and i wouldn’t recommend this comm to a local priest or a nun, but this type of content thrives on pretty much every mainstream platform in some shape or form.

i get it, if this instance wants to be sexually pure and removed from evil carnal desires tho. that’s kind of cool too for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

i had no problem distinguishing the models on the community from children.

You didn’t see the content I saw. Content that was reported as CSAM by someone on this instance, who also thought it was CSAM.

maybe it’s more difficult in some cases without looking for the onlyfans link or sth similar of the model somewhere in the post, but that’s just human anatomy.

Again, a group that is focused on models in which that is the only way you can tell that they’re not underage, is a group that is focused on appealing to people who want underage models. That is a hard no.

Spin it how you like, but I am not going to be allowing material that is easily mistaken from CSAM

permalink
report
parent
reply

I am very disheartened by the number of people replying here who read “a community skirting the line trying to look like CSAM” and felt the need to go purposefully seek out that community to look through its images.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Probably because the community in question isn’t trying to “skirt the line” and just posts popular pornstars that range from 18 to the mid twenties. I thought it was a kink community until someone finally linked the lemmynsfw post and it’s actually just a community for cute pornstars.

Calling it CSAM-adjacent just means that nobody’s comfortable actually looking at it to figure out what’s going on, and hugely exaggerated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

was fine with them

That’s surprising since their rules say that not even fictive under-18 content is allowed:

Posting content involving any person who is under 18 is strictly forbidden. This includes real, drawn, and fictional content.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I guess Trans Littles can just go fuck off then? One of the biggest Trans comics artist is openly a little. Why are we in the business of regulating what consenting adults do?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Thank you. Just the spam in new was bad enough, but CSAM? Holy crap.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

To be clear, it is not CSAM. It is legal porn deliberately designed to look like CSAM

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

In some jurisdictions that is still considered csam. Even if it’s animated or whatever excuse…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Like when Australia floated banning smaller-boobed women from porn, which is also something that everyone agreed with.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

!main@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

Community stats

  • 98

    Monthly active users

  • 100

    Posts

  • 710

    Comments