24 points

I have corporations running ads telling me to save the earth and do my part. Mother fuckers, I do my part and your CEO destroys all my work in one day. I’m kinda getting sick of the blame being put on my poor ass who can barely afford to survive.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

So, I assume you’re vegan? The ecology of this planet will collapse unless most of humanity stops consuming animal products. That or magic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I am. And for every animal I don’t eat, a billionaire throws a meat party and goes hunting for exotic animals. Again, why are you blaming me? Even if I ate meat every meal I wouldn’t come close in a year to doing as much damage as a billionaire does in a day. So again, stop telling me about it and go after them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The number of animals killed annually for human consumption is somewhere north of 50 billion. That’s 50 thousand million.

I want the billionaires dead as much as the next guy, but what you’re saying is not the mathematical reality, and while changing economic systems will lead to justice and fairness, it won’t even begin to solve our ecological problems. It might even worsen them, since our goal would be, presumably, to end poverty and increase standards of living.

Or is that not the plan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Human caused environmental devastation didn’t start in the 1600s, capitalism did. I don’t think humans are a virus, but I don’t think that abolishing capitalism is the only critical step in preventing environmental catastrophe.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

We’ve been here 200,000 years, we’ve been farming for the last 12,000 of those. Environmental destruction is, reletively, a very very new phenomenon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s an a-historical point of view. There have been several environmental catastrophes, including some causing massive climactic shifts introduced by prehistoric humans, some of them are documented in 1491, by Charles Mann. Poor farming practices, including some that have been practiced for thousands of years, are a huge factor in desertification. I completely agree that the rate and scale of environmental catastrophe is new, but the risk of it and tendency towards it is not. While I think capitalism is ABSOLUTELY the single greatest barrier to addressing the catastrophe, the scale and speed of that catastrophe could be just as easily tied to population growth as the emergence of capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not to mention how all megafauna got extinct wherever modern humans showed up

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Given that the environmental depredation of this planet is driven by

  1. the farming of animal products,
  2. the production and consumption of energy, and
  3. the extraction and transformation of material resources,

can people explain why they believe that without capitalism everyone would be a vegan who doesn’t take vacations, use air conditioning, fly on airplanes, or drive a car? I also assume they’re wearing hemp and have no interest in fashion.

Keep in mind there are 8 billion people on this planet, so presumably they wouldn’t be having children either.

EDIT: the reply below completely ignores my question. Very few people seem to actually give a shit about the environment. It’s all just ideological posturing. And that is why we are fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

We don’t produce 1.5 times the food we need, as you said. We produce 100 times the food we need. Know why? To feed the billions of sentient animals that are tortured to death each year in factory abattoirs. Do you have any idea how sustainable that is? It’s not. So…

You’ve taken a roundabout way to tell me that mass adoption of veganism (literally the only way to save the environment) unfortunately has nothing to do with our economic system.

  • Every 3 calories of beef require at least 100 calories of legumes.
  • Worse still, the average water footprint per calorie for beef is twenty times larger than for cereals and starchy roots.
  • Add the methane and the nitrogenous runoff, and you have an ecological catastrophe.
  • If we ended animal agriculture, 75% of all farmland could be rewilded tomorrow.
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They would simply consume less and not be as driven to consume. Capitalism drives up the consumption to ridiculous levels, greed is not actually good. We could focus the economy on needs first and ensure it exists so people can still acquire goods and services in exchange for money so no one is working for nothing. But no more wealth accumulation into the stratosphere. There’s a lot that would need to change

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but that’s woefully inadequate. We need between 2 and 20 earths just to maintain our current standard of living, and keep in mind this number rises as poverty falls.

The only and I mean the only solutions that can support our absurd population is

  1. veganism
  2. tech advancements bordering on magic

It’s just math. I wish things were otherwise, I really do. But that’s what we need to save the rainforests and oceans and wild fauna that are still clinging to existence. Everything else is ideology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Did capitalism destroy this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea

The Aral Sea is considered an example of ecosystem collapse.[42] The ecosystems of the Aral Sea and the river deltas feeding into it have been nearly destroyed, largely because of the salinity being dramatically higher than ocean water.[5] The receding sea has left huge plains covered with salt and toxic chemicals from weapons testing, industrial projects, and runoff of pesticides and fertilizer. Because of the shrinking water source and worsening water and soil quality, pesticides were increasingly used from the 1960s to raise cotton yield, which further polluted the water with toxins (e.g. HCH, TCCD, DDT).[43] Industrial pollution also resulted in PCB and heavy-metal contamination

This was the result of this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Plan_for_the_Transformation_of_Nature

Exploiting nature and fucking things up is not limited to capitalism.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Plus, animal consumption is among the top three causes of ecological destruction on this planet. Do people think burgers only exist under capitalism? That palm oil and pig meat are an obsession of the super rich? It’s not a matter of efficiency (farming is already absurdly efficient). It’s just math. Like everyone will give up chicken nuggets to save the planet or something? Good luck with that. People are obdurate and gross.

Getting rid of capitalism is a step in the right direction, sure, but unless folks are willing to give up meat, cars, airplanes, and who knows what other amenities, we are still just as fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

These can exist at the same time. It is not binary.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

The extinction of animals because of human action predates agriculture. This comic is the middle of the bell curve meme.

permalink
report
reply

Communism

!communism@lemmy.ml

Create post

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

Community stats

  • 905

    Monthly active users

  • 327

    Posts

  • 646

    Comments