The concrete blocks are slowly hoisted upwards by motors powered with electricity from the Swiss power grid. As each block descends, the motors that lift the blocks start spinning in reverse, generating electricity that courses through the thick cables running down the side of the crane and onto the power grid. In the 30 seconds during which the blocks are descending, each one generates about one megawatt of electricity: enough to power roughly 1,000 homes.

0 points

There is a youtube-video from 2 years ago, debunking that idea: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NIhCuzxNvv0

permalink
report
reply
0 points
0 points

Adam Something <3

was hoping someone would link this here.

So many recent “inventions” are just bad versions of already existing inventions. E.g. the gravity energy storage is already perfected in the pumped storage hydro power station, the Hyperloop is way worse than regular trains and so on and so forth…

But that’s irrelevant. You just have to vaguely overpromise stuff to investors and then get a clean exit to cash out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

These can’t save much power and also they need crazy amounts of concrete. It’s a typical startup idea, not very useful.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Concrete is very cheap, not a problem to make this blocks, every dam or bridge need a lot more of concrete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Concrete is very cheap, not a problem to make this blocks

Both statements are wrong. Water is cheaper than concrete and these blocks won’t work for a long time. Apart from that, Concrete is definitely not “green” by any means.

every dam or bridge need a lot more of concrete.

Yeah but every hydro energy dam can also store exponentially more energy than this abomination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Both statements are wrong. Water is cheaper than concrete and these blocks won’t work for a long time. Apart from that, Concrete is definitely not “green” by any means.

Yes, but wiss less mass, ok, concrete isn’t so grren, but this is irrelevant in one construction for years, same in all constructs made with concrete, like the employed for hydro energy dams, which can only be used in places that allow the accumulation of hidro energy.

True that it can’t store the amount of energy like a hidro energy dam, but this is not intended to replace it, but rather an additional system that can be used, like others that exist, such as the aforementioned saline hor geothermic eat accumulators for places where a dam is not viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 7.6K

    Comments

Community moderators