cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/18426215

3 points

Tale as old as time. And guess what will happen? Wifi signal strength will go down.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

how exactly? What will physically happen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Any receiving antenna is basically an energy harvesting device. Usually, it is specially designed to harvest just enough energy to actually receive the signal in order not to weaken the field. In the 2.4GHz spectrum, where WiFi and BT are at home, a sender is limited to 10mW of power. The more power energy harvesting devices draw from this field, the less will be available for other devices to actually receive the information.

Technically, an electromagnetic field of a frequency f will induce an alternating current in an antenna of length lambda/2 (or lambda/4 or even lambda/8, with less power received the smaller they get and lambda=wavelength=speed of light/frequency) that the receiver can “take out” at the antennas mid point and feed it into an amplification circuit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wouldnt the effect be very local? How far could the harvester affect the field? But i suppose it would be quite annoying if multiple people used something like that in densely populated area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This ain’t free at all it’s more like stealing electricity with extra steps. Though if it does not degrade wifi or radio signal I’m up for it be used aside from just wasting away.

permalink
report
reply
-12 points

I would find this super cool if it wasnt for the fact that all of the radio frequencies are owned by the military and corporations. Outdoor IoT could be amazing, but it is kind of dead because you cant actually connect it to the internet without laying down cable or using 4G which is horrible for low power applications.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I don’t know what kind of idea you are getting. Radio and wi-ifi are waves. The wave is what can be used, you don’t care who generated it. To say it somehow the wave is in the air and you just take advantage of it being there to convert it to energy. Doesn’t matter what the wave could have been read as. In general a radio station is not going to stop working for a whole region just to stop you from using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Maybe i left out too much context.

Im not talking about the research itself, but about how it could be utilized.

Their idea (having small devices that can be powered by nothing but stray radiowaves) apparently works and is great by itself.

However its usefullness is limited if you cant somehow connect those devices with the rest of the world. Thats the issue im complaining about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What are you asking for here? Some sort of worldwide free ISP?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There are tons of small devices that don’t have to be connected to be useful. Lots of personal items or small sensors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is the same take as people thinking wind energy steals wind, or solar energy reduces the sun’s efficacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You are confusing what i am talking about. See my other response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Technically, a properly tuned receiver that’s using the signal for power can create radio “shadows” behind the device. People have also been caught with giant coils in their attic siphoning power from nearby radio stations and high voltage power lines, because they can detect the power draw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They… have? Have a source? That sounds nuts!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Wind energy does.

It’s just that we can’t extract sufficient energy from it to have any meaningful impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly my analogy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just use solar and batteries?🤷🏼‍♀️

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Wouldn’t this just decrease the reception for rf devices? Isn’t it just stealing power from the system to power other devices?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

No more than any random objects.

Think of it like a solar panel. Yes, it blocks light from things behind it, but it doesn’t suck light from nearby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s interesting! I thought that if you for example have a 50w RF transmitter, taking 40w from it would make it act as a 10w one for the other devices around it.

Thx for the explanation :3

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It you could build a 40w antenna sure, but it’d basically have to be a dome surrounding the transmitting one at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The dawn of the Matrix is almost here chunmers!

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.1K

    Posts

  • 131K

    Comments