The Danish government will try to find legal means that will enable authorities to prevent the burning of copies of the Quran in front of other countriesā embassies in Denmark, Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen has said.
āThe burnings are deeply offensive and reckless acts committed by few individuals. These few individuals do not represent the values the Danish society is built on,ā Rasmussen said in a statement on Sunday.
āThe Danish government will therefore explore the possibility of intervening in special situations where, for instance, other countries, cultures, and religions are being insulted, and where this could have significant negative consequences for Denmark, not least with regard to security,ā he said.
Denmark and Sweden have found themselves in the international spotlight in recent weeks following protests where the Quran, the Islamic holy book, has been damaged or burned.
In a separate statement on Sunday, Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said he had been in close contact with his Danish counterpart Mette Frederiksen, and that a similar process was already under way in Sweden.
āWe have also started to analyse the legal situation already ā¦ in order to consider measures to strengthen our national security and the security of Swedes in Sweden and around the world,ā Kristersson said in a post to Instagram.
Outrage in Muslim countries
This month, far-right activists have carried out a number of public burnings of Islamās holy book in front of the Iraqi, Egyptian, and Turkish embassies in the Danish capital.
On Monday, two members of the ultra-nationalist Danish Patriots stomped on a copy of the Quran and set it alight in a tin foil tray next to an Iraqi flag.
Earlier this month in Sweden, an Iraqi citizen living in the country, Salwan Momika, 37, stomped on the holy book and set several pages alight.
The public burnings in the Scandinavian countries have sparked widespread outrage across Muslim countries, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Morocco, Qatar and Yemen lodging protests in response.
Sweden and Denmark have said they deplore the burning of the Koran but cannot prevent it under their rules protecting freedom of expression.
The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) earlier this month approved a resolution on religious hatred and bigotry following several burnings.
Pakistan and other Organisation of Islamic Cooperation countries backed the motion, along with a number of non-Muslim majority countries including India and Vietnam. The United States and the European Union opposed the resolution on the grounds it interfered with freedom of expression.
In his statement, Rasmussen added that whatever measure was taken āmust of course be done within the framework of the constitutionally protected freedom of expression and in a manner that does not change the fact that freedom of expression in Denmark has very broad scopeā.
Honestly I am all for freedom of speech and am atheist, but I donāt think burning books is a form of free speech that should be recognized.
I feel no matter the book, burning it is just low class and only done to fuel anger. Itās more akin to hate speech than free speech.
There are plenty of other ways to get your point across, only ābad guysā resort to burning books.
So you want the freedom of speech only to apply to high class good guys?
Donāt get me wrong, I think burning books is an absolutely shitty use of oneās freedom of speech or expresssion, believe me, as a German, I do.
But I am not sure it is the role of a modern state to tell its citizens how to express themselves as long as it is not directly inciting or glorifying violence.
I hoped it was clickbait, but it isnāt. What the fuck Denmark.
Denmark doesnāt have unrestricted free speech. Censorship is against the constitution but hate speech, inciting violence or defamation is illegal and until 2017 blasphemy was illegal. There is some legal basis for punishing speech that is bringing the country into danger or is severely insulting another nation. I am not a lawyer so I donāt know if itās applicable or if it will hold up in court.
Note that the government does not want to ban burning books. Just prevent/punish doing it as a provocation against another country.
I also want to stress that I am not defending the Danish government or the book burners. I just want to bring some needed nuance to the discussion
