The group End Clergy Abuse issued an open letter to the cardinals who are meeting informally this week before the start of the May 7 conclave. SNAP, the main U.S.-based survivor group, also identified cardinals who themselves have problematic records in a new database, highlighting a new level of scrutiny of all possible contenders for the papacy.

The developments come amid real questions about how prominent the abuse scandal is featuring in the discussions about finding a new pope. After two decades of unrelenting revelations about abuse and cover-up that have discredited the Catholic hierarchy, many church leaders would like to think the issue is in the past, the survivors said.

“The sexual abuse crisis is not a matter of the past. It is present. And nowhere is its devastation more visible than in the Global South,” the survivors said in the open letter.

59 points

“No rapey pope please” is such a low bar ffs

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Honestly not so sure about that. Seems like people who reach the highest positions of power in any organization in the world are extremely over represented in the “take what they want without worrying about the consequences for others” category of people. Makes you wonder how we choose leaders in general, not just the how the Church does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I mean if they have rules against fraud and bribery you would think having rules against sexual assault and abuse would be a no-brainer. Yet here we are … still.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

We’re no closer to criminalizing insider trading by elected officials than prosecuting religious leaders for raping our children — for centuries. That’s proof enough we’re fucked as a civilization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

When I said “they” I was referencing the Vatican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I was alluding to the fact that their “rules” are historically for sale, and the modern judicial system as a whole is a crock of fetid shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If only they were cardinals, huh?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s not called ‘Cardinal sin’ for nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The Venn diagram of Catholic* priests and perpetually protected rapists is a circle drawn in crayon.

/* for example

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It isn’t really a circle though, there are also politicians, media people, police and military officers,…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Many. Many layers. 🤮

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Positions of power with lots of fragile prey will always attract predators. Priests, pastors, teachers, scouts, coaches, sanatoriums, families, youth groups, etc.

It takes a good system of heightened vigilance to keep these safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That alludes to said predators arriving on-scene after the target group has already hobbled & offered itself to exploitation of its soft bits to such — thereby ignoring the ineffable truth that this specific predator population’s been cultivating exactly this for centuries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was more an explanations as to why predators flock to these institutions. Unless you’re suggesting the Catholic priests in questions are thousand-year-old immortals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ha as if

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 163K

    Comments