Epic Games v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers just ruled that, effective immediately, Apple is no longer allowed to collect fees on purchases made outside apps and blocks the company from restricting how developers can point users to where they can make purchases outside of apps.

. .

The judge also referred the case to the US attorney to review it for possible criminal contempt proceedings.

34 points

Good. Operating systems should be neutral. The people who make them should not be allowed to dictate the terms that others use to interact with their platforms.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

Hey maybe not fuckepic just this once.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

The worst person you know just made a great point

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Always fuck epic, but fuck Apple harder.

That there’s a very narrow overlap of epic and general consumer/other devs interests doesn’t make epic good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Tbh for a broken clock Sweeney shows the right time remarkably often. Can’t believe it, the bar for people like him is so low just being consistent is noteworthy lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Lmao, the fuckepic and ‘Tim Sweeney is a bastard man’ sentiments were always wildly overblown.

The fact that anyone took Apple’s side in this case (because the Epic game store paid for a couple exclusive games to try and break into the market) is laughably childish.

Apple literally rips off the entire world to the tune of billions of dollars a year through app store mafia extortion fees alone, let alone the rest of their anti-competitive bullshit.

Epic was just trying to break into the Apple / Google / Steam monopolies and made a couple unpopular / anti-consumer business moves on a couple games (all the while taking afar smaller cut of profits than any other store), meanwhile Apple has based their literal entire multi-decade business model on anti-consumer choices and done that for every single hardware and software device they sell you.

They are not remotely comparable. Epic was always fully in the right in their anti-monopoly legal battles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

It’s always fun when two terrible tech giants fight it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Indeed, a little bit of intra-class war for them, for a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Epic’s most redeeming quality is their willingness to take bigger companies to court for their trash policies. Now if only we could get the FTC to do their jobs so Epic wouldn’t have to…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Didn’t Elon gut the FTC?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes but Apple did not build this system in the last 3 months, they’ve done it over the course of 3 decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I recommend liberal use of the concept of critical support

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Rogers also says that Apple “willfully” chose not to comply with her previous injunction from her original 2021 ruling

Why did it take them 4 years to enforce their own ruling?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Because the legal system is low moving even when major corporations aren’t trying to delay things and you can bet that Apple did everything they could to slow down enforcement. I’m surprised it only took 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What can they do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If you’re asking what Apple can do, a lot.

In civil litigation, one of the big steps is discovery, where each party is trying to gather information that they want to use. That can take several months or longer, especially when the two parties disagree on what information ought to be shared.

During discovery, and at other times, each party will file motions asking for certain things, certain rules to be imposed, for example. And then the other party will file a response motion. And then maybe the judge will schedule oral arguments, or maybe they won’t, and the judge will make a ruling. Because the deadlines are usually on the orders of months, and at the very least weeks, it’s easy for the process to get drawn out.

And the judge is typically working other cases. So even if they get some documents on Monday, they might not be able to schedule a meeting until 3 weeks from now, for example. But even if they could rush, there’s typically not a huge necessity to do so. In this situation, the judge could impose massive financial sanctions on Apple for past conduct, should they choose to do so. In the end, this is all about money and because of that it can be resolved by making one party pay the other a lot of money. So delaying is a tactic but it doesn’t necessarily save you money in the end, not if you lose, because the duration of the bad behavior is longer and therefore you owe more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Apple has $50B+ in literal cash. Epic’s entire revenue is under $7B/yr. Apple can afford to run Epic for decades on their cash reserves alone without impacting their bottom line.

That’s why it took 4 years. I’m surprised Apple didn’t bury them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t understand what that has to do with anything? It doesn’t cost either of them anything to enforce a ruling the court already made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To be clear, I’m not defending anyone here…

Apple likely delayed it multiple times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Sweeney is also offering a “peace proposal” from Epic: “If Apple extends the court’s friction-free, Apple-tax-free framework worldwide, we’ll return Fortnite to the App Store worldwide and drop current and future litigation on the topic.”

Pretty sure this has a 0% chance of working.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

rats scavenging for the last vestiges of growth in a world that hates them at the moment. Will the rats compromise or will they eat each other? My vote is on the latter.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 228K

    Comments