I always had high hopes for SSDs to come down in price enough to rival spinning rust, but it seems we’ve hit a wall around 4TB for the time being. If HAMR drives don’t turn out to be outrageously expensive, I’ll be spinning discs in my NAS for the foreseeable

0 points

Earlier roadmaps set a goal of reaching 100TB by the end of the decade.

Linux ISOs here I come!

It’ll be interesting to see how reliable these things are. That’s a lot of data to store in one place and RAID rebuild times will be long.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Aren’t RAID rebuilds on 16TB drives already like a week? Maybe those HAMR drives will have two actuators, but I still don’t think that’ll speed things up much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I recently migrated my QNAP NAS from 20TB single with a 2nd drive to RAID1. It did a rebuild that took just over 48h. Then I added another drive and migrated to RAID5. It did again just over 48h rebuild. So it’s not too bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If you have an SMR drive ZFS resilvers can take upwards of three weeks haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Omg don’t remind me of the SMR fiasco. I once bought an SMR drive by accident and didn’t understand why overwriting lots of small files happened at like 5kbps…I couldn’t believe it when I found out!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hardware

!hardware@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to electronic hardware
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Community stats

  • 226

    Monthly active users

  • 175

    Posts

  • 327

    Comments

Community moderators