This post is “FYI only” for blahaj lemmy members. It is not a debate, and is not intended for non blahaj lemmy users to weigh in and offer opinions.

I recently received reports of a feddit.uk user espousing transphobia. Specifically, this was a feddit.uk user refusing to use the word cis, repeating the “adult human female” dog whistle, and claiming that trans women are not women. I approached a member of the feddit.uk admin team and raised my concerns and sought clarification of their stance on posts like this, where the transphobia is mostly dogwhistles, and “civil disagreement” on the validity of trans folk.

I was told by the feddit.uk admin that their preferred response is this kind of transphobia is to “sort it out through discussion and voting”. However, the comments in question are currently more upvoted than downvoted, and little “sorting out” has occurred. The posts remain in place.

At this point, the admin stopped responding to my messages despite being active elsewhere on lemmy. When it became clear they were ignoring my messages and had no intention of removing the posts in question, I made the decision to defederate the instance.

I know some folk agree with the feddit.uk admins approach of pushback through discussion and voting, but this instance is not designed to be that kind of space. Blahaj lemmy is meant to be a place where we can avoid the rampant transphobia universally visible on nearly every other social media platform, and where we can exist without needing to debate our right to do so.

212 points
*

Obviously I’m not on blahaj, but I think the decision is pretty on point for the goals of blahaj.

It also makes me disappointed in feddit.uk. “Leave it to discussion/votes” is bullshit and just support for the behavior.

Edit: The admin responded elsewhere with “we want to make sure we comply with the law”.

My comment remains unchanged. Allowing this is support. Fuck your bullshit law. You’re explicitly supporting this bullshit by your inaction.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Admin, ban this person! Clearly a non blahaj user voicing their opinion where explicitly told not to!

Tap for spoiler

/s, doh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

Right? Imagine if you said that about the rights for like black women or something? Like, come ON. It’s 2025, we KNOW these behaviors are bigoted, rules are way too chill with letting shit like that fly, and is part of the reason it’s so prolific now - it’s not being treated like the hate speech that it is, and people in power in certain places are like “no I’m not sure we need to discuss it again”. It’s just gross and horrible and makes me feel so fucking helpless sometimes when a space is dominated with shitties like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

100%.

It’s nothing short of support for the behavior. Its why I constantly comment of Lemmy.world being trash, and why I say 196 mods are garbage and don’t belong on blahaj, long live !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone.

Even suggesting that sort of vile nonsense is worth discussing/voting on makes them bigoted morons.

Edit: Sorry I sound cranky about it, but this “tEaCh tHe CoNtRoVeRsY” garbage puts me in a cranky mood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

lemmy.world is basically the fediverse version of Reddit from what I’ve experienced in terms of overall culture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m not on here often enough to be in the loop, what’s the 196 community drama?

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

“we want to make sure we comply with the law”

on here?

…Christ, why? lmao

They must think they’re the main character of lemmy or someshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Just as bad as Lemmy.world with their admins being totally pro lawyers who just haven’t taken the bar, they’d totally pass though.

Maybe worse, we’ll see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

“meh, those things sound like work”

feddit.uk admin

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

They had the time to make a new rule about no generative AI content but couldn’t work this out? Stuff em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

i tried to tell them it sounded more like cowardice than laziness but they just wouldnt hear it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Agreed, fuck 'em.

If the users of feddit.uk want to engage with us, they’re totally welcome to do so on our terms by making an account somewhere that holds their users to a better standard. I hope they do. As far as I’m concerned, the users are cool, but we don’t have to coddle somebody else’s bigotry or put up with hatred.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s pretty fucked up a court ruling that’s shit sees such quick implementation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

These are tough calls to make. On the one hand I applaud the step taken to protect the community hosted by this instance, on the other I also find that simply cuting ties and conversation only furthers the divide.

Sure we should not have to defend the validity of our existence, and also realise that most hate leaves little place for heathy discussions. But in avoiding their echo chambers I find we quiet ours too, we renounce our visibility for our comfort and theirs.

I guess I wish there were other ways to warn users about potentially triggering instances rather than outright defederating, but I do understand your main motives.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

You are absolutely welcome to maintain an account on another instance and here if you want to have the option of having those discussions. And I don’t mean that in a “Well, there’s the door” way. What I’m trying to say is that if you don’t want to have the types of conversations you’re talking about, it’s currently very hard to find spaces that make that possible. That’s why lbz exists in the form it does. However, I completely understand that some people do want that opportunity. And if that’s you, you’re welcome to maintain multiple accounts. You’ll always have a space here, but you can also use instances that give you access to less protective spaces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

ada continues to be the realest MVP

permalink
report
reply
37 points

If instances aren’t willing to moderate themselves when it comes to transphobia they should get the boot. I hope more instances defederate feddit.uk over this. Might make them change course and rethink if they should maybe moderate better.

permalink
report
reply
82 points

As a denizen of terf island myself, all I can say is; fucking good! Our enemies hide behind statements like “just asking questions”, but there’s no room for debate when it comes to people’s rights and look where that thinking has gotten us.

The time for debate is over. I want my rights back.

permalink
report
reply

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

!main@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 156

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments