Explanation: Sir Alec Guinness played Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars: Episode IV. He also played the Emperor Marcus Aurelius in The Fall of the Roman Empire, a 1964 film.
It’s a bit mid, honestly, but has a rare depiction of the Germanic/Roman barritus warcry in a funeral scene.
but he was a jedi master “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away”. wouldn’t that gig have come first?
Headcanon: He definitely was brave enough and engaged in it too, by necessity of Jedi being called on for mediation and diplomacy as well as the need of a general to coordinate with the civil leadership of planets he’s fighting on or for.
Downplaying his interest in politics would be both a sign of humility (“I don’t need to rub elbows with important people, I’,m just a humble guy”) and sensible politics in itself by signalling that he’s not out for power plays, just doing his duty.
That also kinda tracks with Marcus Aurelius, who allegedly didn’t like being named Emperor by the senate as he preferred philosophy over power. He did accept the office out of a sense of duty, on the condition that his adoptive brother be made Co-Emperor.
The parallel I’m getting at here is that both might not have been passionate politicians, but will have competently and dutifully risen to the task when called on. They were also both militarily successful in the later years of their respective careers as Emperor and as Jedi Master.
Hence: Marcus Aurelius Antoninus an Obi-Wan Kenobi are the same person. QED